Originally posted by King Castle
here u gohttp://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Thor%20Stats/ThorStrength25.jpg
Aaahhh, hyperbole.
So its ok for me to present my scan that indicates that gladiator has unlimited strength? Or how about a scan that states that wolverine claws could cut through anything? That should be enough to prove that he could cut through surfer, supes, and gladiator huh?
Let me know your answer to this.
Carver whenSkaar amped to the degree you are speaking off he was only able to do so because he absorbed the pwoer that world Breaker Hulk created when he almost broke the seaboard off again. Unless the ground happens to be going through the same thing he'd be stuck at his normal levels. Which are no where near that high. He's stronger durign earthquakes and stuff.
Which is why he wasn't so strong all the other times, it depends on the plate activity
Originally posted by carver9
Aaahhh, hyperbole.So its ok for me to present my scan that indicates that gladiator has unlimited strength? Or how about a scan that states that wolverine claws could cut through anything? That should be enough to prove that he could cut through surfer, supes, and gladiator huh?
Let me know your answer to this.
Lmao gtfo with that piss poor analogy.
What if I argue that the trillion ton thing was simply hyperbole?
If that was Gladiator, you'd have hoped on that scene like a b*tch in heat. And I still remember how you tried to push Gladiator's strength being nigh unlimited and above Thor's.
Originally posted by jalek moye
Carver whenSkaar amped to the degree you are speaking off he was only able to do so because he absorbed the pwoer that world Breaker Hulk created when he almost broke the seaboard off again. Unless the ground happens to be going through the same thing he'd be stuck at his normal levels. Which are no where near that high. He's stronger durign earthquakes and stuff.Which is why he wasn't so strong all the other times, it depends on the plate activity
That is why I said skaar at his prime and nuul is using that sakaar in this thread... the same one that fought hulk.
Originally posted by carver9its not hyperbole when it explain the context of the scan and giving it a definite description...
Aaahhh, hyperbole.So its ok for me to present my scan that indicates that gladiator has unlimited strength? Or how about a scan that states that wolverine claws could cut through anything? That should be enough to prove that he could cut through surfer, supes, and gladiator huh?
Let me know your answer to this.
hyperbole is like i am the best, strongest one there is... seeing as we have seen stronger and better or he punches as hard as superman or hulk and referencing guys like zoom, cap, spiderman or murlon.
any how i never questioned wolverine's ability to cut certain beings you have to take that with haters and certain fanboys who refuse to allow wolverine to injure their hero or villain.
also we seen logan to fail to cut at least 3 ppl iirc
Originally posted by carver9
That is why I said skaar at his prime and nuul is using that sakaar in this thread... the same one that fought hulk.
I'm saying though unless you mean if he starts at that level, because that was what Skaar could always do just he never had that much energy lying around.
If I'm misunderstanding sorry, I'm just annoyed with people acting liek he starts every fight like that
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Lmao gtfo with that piss poor analogy.What if I argue that the trillion ton thing was simply hyperbole?
If that was Gladiator, you'd have hoped on that scene like a b*tch in heat. And I still remember how you tried to push Gladiator's strength being nigh unlimited and above Thor's.
I never said that gladiator had unlimited strength but I did say that he is stronger than thor. It was stated TWICE that glads has near unlimited strength... so again, if one hyperbole is accepted, all is accepted. There is no pick and choosing. With that said, I can also bring up the two scans of gladiator being called the most powerful being in the universe AND the galaxy.
Originally posted by King Castle
its not hyperbole when it explain the context of the scan and giving it a definite description...hyperbole is like i am the best, strongest one there is... seeing as we have seen stronger and better or he punches as hard as superman or hulk and referencing guys like zoom, cap, spiderman or murlon.
any how i never questioned wolverine's ability to cut certain beings you have to take that with haters and certain fanboys who refuse to allow wolverine to injure their hero or villain.
also we seen logan to fail to cut at least 3 ppl iirc
I agree to a certain extent. I can't think of any feats that thor has that presents him as someone that could physically bust a planet with nothing but strength.
once you reach a certain lvl of power their power becomes dynamic as does their strength, durability and we dont resort to who has the greater lifting feat but who fights better and who loses the most and by whom on panel..
look at it like this beta ray bill has trashed planets as has gladiator and look how thor stacks up to them..
thor isnt running around destroying planets its not in his cis anymore then it is for supes
Originally posted by carver9
I never said that gladiator had unlimited strength but I did say that he is stronger than thor. It was stated TWICE that glads has near unlimited strength... so again, if one hyperbole is accepted, all is accepted. There is no pick and choosing. With that said, I can also bring up the two scans of gladiator being called the most powerful being in the universe AND the galaxy.
😬
Originally posted by carver9
I disagree... glad mood is his power... hell, it fuels his power. He does not have a cap on his strength and again, this has been stated more than once, even by the genious Reed. Hell, gladiator power made a thanos clone 4 times stronger than the real deal.
Originally posted by carver9
You can't deny on panel proof... especially reed kind of proof along with other files that is kept on glads.
baka
Gladiator has no cap on his strength. Reasoning? It was said so.
Ignoring the hypocrisy with Gladiator, my question is:
What if I argue that the trillion ton thing was simply hyperbole?
P.S. Gladiator is not stronger than Thor.
http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy73/R-O-G/Thor/MastersonThorvsGladiator4.jpg
As strong, at best.
Originally posted by jalek moye
I'm saying though unless you mean if he starts at that level, because that was what Skaar could always do just he never had that much energy lying around.If I'm misunderstanding sorry, I'm just annoyed with people acting liek he starts every fight like that
I agree with this... a regular skaar wouldn't last 10 minutes against thor.
unless they do the earth quake dango... em i right?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
😬baka
Gladiator has no cap on his strength. Reasoning? It was said so.
Ignoring the hypocrisy with Gladiator, my question is:
What if I argue that the trillion ton thing was simply hyperbole?
Where in those post did I say he has unlimited strength? What I DID say is that he doesn't have a cap on his strength and all in all, he doesn't since again, his strength is based off of his mood.
A scientist called out skaar strength and what he was absorbing, that's completely different than a hyperbole statement.
baka
No his not.
Originally posted by carver9
Where in those post did I say he has unlimited strength? What I DID say is that he doesn't have a cap on his strength and all in all, he doesn't since again, his strength is based off of his mood.A scientist called out skaar strength and what he was absorbing, that's completely different than a hyperbole statement.
You're so full of sh*t.
No cap on his strength means there's no limit. I.e. unlimited. And you were basing this off of on panel statements. The same type of evidence that you just tried to devalue by using this faulty analogy.
*Sigh* You could use the hyperbole argument if KC tried to argue that Thor resisted incalculable force like stated on panel. His -I'm assuming- is arguing that Thor resisted a force akin to a Neutron Star. It was a comparison. Not some vague unquantifiable throw away line you hear among strong man characters like unstoppable, invincible, mightiest etc.
Once again: GTFO.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
bakaNo his not.
You're so full of sh*t.
No cap on his strength means there's no limit. I.e. unlimited. And you were basing this off of on panel statements. The same type of evidence that you just tried to devalue by using this faulty analogy.
*Sigh* You could use the hyperbole argument if KC tried to argue that Thor resisted incalculable force like stated on panel. His -I'm assuming- is arguing that Thor resisted a force akin to a Neutron Star. It was a comparison. Not some vague unquantifiable throw away line you hear among strong man characters like unstoppable, invincible, mightiest etc.
Once again: GTFO.
😕
Hulk doesn't have a cap on his strength as well. Even though a character doesn't have a cap doesn't mean that they have unlimited strength. Gladiator and Hulks strength are both based completely off of their mood which again, has been shown on panel.
The statement or scan that you presented, EVERYONE has it, that is why we go by feats. I don't disagree with thor resisting high level of energy or even a gravitational pull but again, there is nothing showing that he can destroy a planet with brute strength.
