^Forgot about that.
Originally posted by Nihilist
So he was casually annihilating life across the Universe, yet Firelord could shield himself from a blast and was fine 😂
Firelord apparently barely being able to block some random energy backlash isn't an argument. At least not one that can support your stance.
What is it exactly that you're denying? That Thanos' energy wasn't amped? That's asinine.
IIRC, it was stated -by Odin perhaps- if Thanos were to finally gain the power, he would begin unleashing waves of death across the entire Universe. And when he first one shotted the planet, it was outright stated that he was elevated -amped- beyond measure.
And for whatever it's worth, I believe Firelord admitted that even he could not enter the energy web that Thanos blasted Thor with.
The only thing you could even begin to contest is whether or not his physical strength was amped. I thought it was clear it was an across the board amp. He was glowing with power and a Mjolnir throw literally bounced off of him.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusThor took the same back lash of energy that Firelord blocked.
Firelord apparently barely being able to block some random energy backlash isn't an argument. At least not one that can support your stance.What is it exactly that you're denying? That Thanos' energy wasn't amped? That's asinine.
IIRC, it was stated -by Odin perhaps- if Thanos were to finally gain the power, he would begin unleashing waves of death across the entire Universe. And when he first one shotted the planet, it was outright stated that he was elevated -amped- beyond measure.
For whatever it's worth, Firelord admitted that even he could not enter the energy web that Thanos blasted Thor with.
Originally posted by Silent MasterZero proof it was different, you mean apart from the size and width of the blast or the amount of energy show in the blast and the fact Thanos fired from his eyes not his hands.
"Death blast" is just a name you gave to the blast he fired off planet. you have zero proof that it was any different than the blast he hit Thor with.
And you have zero proof it wanst any different.
Originally posted by Nihilist
Zero proof it was different, you mean apart from the size and width of the blast or the amount of energy show in the blast and the fact Thanos fired from his eyes not his hands.And you have zero proof it wanst any different.
Check again, when he first starts firing the blast into space, it isn't very wide.
Originally posted by Nihilist
Thor took the same back lash of energy that Firelord blocked.
Good job refuting everything. 👆
Thor was the main target of the attack. As far as I can tell, Firelord blocked one of those spikes of energy that broke off from ground zero.
Once again: Does not support your stance.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusWider than the huge hole in the surface of the planet that killed 41 billion people in the process.
What exactly is it that you two are discussing? The width of the attacks? The energy web engulfing Thor was wider than the energy blast emanating from Thanos' hand.
Illogical.
Originally posted by Nihilist
Wider than the huge hole in the surface of the planet that killed 41 billion people in the process.
I assumed that was simply the planet exploding. IIRC, the beam was narrow like it was when it left his hand up. When it struck, she just went boom.
The attack would have to have gotten suddenly much more wider when it struck the planet.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusFor f*cks sake it clear as day how wide the blast is compared to his eyes beam.
Illogical.I assumed that was simply the planet exploding. IIRC, the beam was narrow like it was when it left his hand up. When it struck, she just went boom.
The attack would have to have gotten suddenly much more wider when it struck the planet.