Heroic Age: Villains/Superheroes

Started by Dum Dum Dugan3 pages

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
It looks like that, I mean.

No idea, don't have the access to that book now so I can't check.


true it does seem like that in many cases.

I have it and that how it seems to me but just looking for your opinion on the matter. People like Thor, wonderman ect have far lower ratings then street levels like punisher, moonknight ect. on the vulnerability

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Punisher is more powerful than the likes of Paladin, Prince or Orphans or Wolverine?

Yeah right.

pff... bull..

@BH

i missed you..
whimper

Originally posted by King Castle
pff... bull..

@BH

i missed you..
whimper


Hahahaha, I missed you to buddy 😄

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I have it and that how it seems to me but just looking for your opinion on the matter. People like Thor, wonderman ect have far lower ratings then street levels like punisher, moonknight ect. on the vulnerability

I checked a few entries and I don't think it's a physical vulnerability.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
I checked a few entries and I don't think it's a physical vulnerability.

I think it all around valnerability, durability, damage soak ect. If you look a lot of the more damage resistent individuals have far lower vulnerability listings.

It can also mean emotionally or mentally vulnerability and how easy they can fly off the handle, or how easily they can be controlled.

Dont look at it as strickly as a power-wise basis. Hence the "power-grid" is mostly emotional characteristics.

Originally posted by -K-M-
It can also mean emotionally or mentally vulnerability and how easy they can fly off the handle, or how easily they can be controlled.

Dont look at it as strickly as a power-wise basis. Hence the "power-grid" is mostly emotional characteristics.


True and I agree, though physical has to take a fair size portion of the vulnerability if you look at the characters with the lowest vulnerabilities compared with those of the highest.

It's mostly meant as emotionally vulnerable, as people Steve said were mentally weak were listed to have low vulnerability.

Originally posted by -K-M-
It's mostly meant as emotionally vulnerable, as people Steve said were mentally weak were listed to have low vulnerability.

when did he say this? I have it in front of me and I dont see this at all. In fact it make little sense if that was the case being Thor far from mentally weak and he one of the lowest on the scale. In fact it seems like being lower in vulnerability is better then being higher.

More I read through it, the more it seems to me the higher you are the worse. It also seems to encompass all of vulnerability both physically, mentalling, emotionally, and other forms.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
when did he say this? I have it in front of me and I dont see this at all. In fact it make little sense if that was the case being Thor far from mentally weak and he one of the lowest on the scale. In fact it seems like being lower in vulnerability is better then being higher.

The whole thing is written in Steve's perspective.

But you can also look at it that those with no powers have more mental will then those who do as they have to try harder. It's honestly hard to say how it's guage, I wouldn't try to put much thought into it as it could go many different ways.

Originally posted by -K-M-
The whole thing is written in Steve's perspective.

But you can also look at it that those with no powers have more mental will then those who do as they have to try harder. It's honestly hard to say how it's guage, I wouldn't try to put much thought into it as it could go many different ways.


yes I know.

Honestly I disagree, to me it seems quite clear being higher in vulnerability is a bad thing. The more vulnerable you are the higher. Which is why all the streets are so high, such as hawlkeve for one is level 9. Because Thor is not mentalling nor physically vulnerable which is why he only at a level 5-6. Becuase he really not vulnerable in an real sense.

I assumed the higher the vulnerability the more you're vulnerable.

Here's Thor:

10 in everything except free will which is at a 9 -due to his allegiances to Asgard I'm guessing- and vulnerability which is at 6.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I assumed the higher the vulnerability the more you're vulnerable.

Here's Thor:

10 in everything except free will which is at a 9 -due to his allegiances to Asgard I'm guessing- and vulnerability which is at 6.


I agree.

though I can see were KM coming from it is very vague and can diffidently be interpreted in different ways.

It can, but I think it makes more sense this way. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the comic to confirm how the rankings match up.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I assumed the higher the vulnerability the more you're vulnerable.

Here's Thor:

10 in everything except free will which is at a 9 -due to his allegiances to Asgard I'm guessing- and vulnerability which is at 6.

Nice. It's stupid that his vulnerability is at 6 though.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
It can, but I think it makes more sense this way. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the comic to confirm how the rankings match up.

I agree it makes more senses this way. I have the comic and it does not explain vulnerability at all.

Originally posted by Badabing
Nice. It's stupid that his vulnerability is at 6 though.

why? It one of the lowest vulnerabilities out there. It should be low meaning he not very vulnerable at all.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
why? It one of the lowest vulnerabilities out there. It should be low meaning he not very vulnerable at all.

👆

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
why? It one of the lowest vulnerabilities out there. It should be low meaning he not very vulnerable at all.
Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
👆
I think Thor should have the highest degree of invulnerability. So shut up. durfist

If I recall correctly Steve said people with the most vulnerability were dettached from regular people and hence worse heroes. It's in the introduction, as such, you can take vulnerability as a messure of dettachement.