Originally posted by quanchi112You need to PROVE to me Odin has superior feats.
Your logic states Odin is superior. He has better feats but is portrayed as far weaker. I use the same logic so I go by portrayals and not based on superior feats. So based on your logic you believe Odin wins and is more powerful based off of his superior feats.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
Not always. But most of the times yes.once you prove to me that Odin is superior to abstracts then I will concede the point. But the thing is you have to use his....feats. So prove Odin is superior to eternity and celestials. Except you still have to prove these are true.
Based on feats we know Galactus is stronger then Supeman. Based on feats we know eternity is stronger then Odin. Stop making these claims that feats show heralds as superior to abstracts as they aren't true. Odin and Superman have ridiculous feats for being their level but they still aren't galactus level.
what lifting feats doesnt galactus have that leads u to believe galactus is stronger than superman?
Originally posted by Black bolt zWe already played this game and the best you could do was hurling planets. Shaking the multiverse, wrecking galaxies, affecting the entire space continuum beats anything to my knowledge of the Celestials. Name better feats then, sport.
You need to [b]PROVE to me Odin has superior feats. [/B]
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiExactly his logic is so silly he will argue against himself.
what lifting feats doesnt galactus have that leads u to believe galactus is stronger than superman?
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosilifting feats? Thanos doesn't have lifting feats. Are you only going to argue using lifting feats?
what lifting feats doesnt galactus have that leads u to believe galactus is stronger than superman?
Originally posted by quanchi112OK so the only quatifiable feat you have me was multiverse busting.
We already played this game and the best you could do was hurling planets. Shaking the multiverse, wrecking galaxies, affecting the entire space continuum beats anything to my knowledge of the Celestials. Name better feats then, sport. Exactly his logic is so silly he will argue against himself.
Multiple times it has been stated infinity and eternity are equal. Infinity is stronger then Maelstrom and Galactus was powerless to stop maelstrom and galactus has busted galaxies.
Originally posted by Black bolt zWe are talking about Celestials who have been portrayed as superior to Odin which I agree with but featwise Odin is much more impressive so according to you Odin wins.
lifting feats? Thanos doesn't have lifting feats. Are you only going to argue using lifting feats? OK so the only quatifiable feat you have me was multiverse busting.Multiple times it has been stated infinity and eternity are equal. Infinity is stronger then Maelstrom and Galactus was powerless to stop maelstrom and galactus has busted galax[b]ies
. [/B]
This isn't about Maelstrom and that's not a feat that's portrayal anyways. You can't even seem to tell the difference.
Originally posted by quanchi112Mabye you were talking about celestials. Celestials don't have many feats to speak of. Except mabye eliminating a the populations of whole planets with ease.
We are talking about Celestials who have been portrayed as superior to Odin which I agree with but featwise Odin is much more impressive so according to you Odin wins.This isn't about Maelstrom and that's not a feat that's portrayal anyways. You can't even seem to tell the difference.
No its not. Its a feat. Considering its a statement eternity and infinity are equals(and a feat when they megred to show they were equal). The Maelstrom stated oblivion was more powerful then him which was proven by feats and galactus was powerless to stop Mael.
Originally posted by Black bolt zEliminating populations with ease isn't impressive considering Odin's resume.
Mabye you were talking about celestials. Celestials don't have many feats to speak of. Except mabye eliminating a the populations of whole planets with ease.No its not. Its a feat. Considering its a statement eternity and infinity are equals(and a feat when they megred to show they were equal). The Maelstrom stated oblivion was more powerful then him which was proven by feats and galactus was powerless to stop Mael.
No, that's how they are portrayed they portrayed Mael as superior to Galactus while outside feats of Galactus' were more impressive imo.
Mael's role as anomaly is one thing but we saw Mael killed and then reformed in the same arc. LOL.
So do you agree Odin is superior based off of feats so therefore Odin wins. If you say no you argue against yourself.
Originally posted by quanchi112Odins most impressive feat ever is destroying a galaxy.
Eliminating populations with ease isn't impressive considering Odin's resume.No, that's how they are portrayed they portrayed Mael as superior to Galactus while outside feats of Galactus' were more impressive imo.
Mael's role as anomaly is one thing but we saw Mael killed and then reformed in the same arc. LOL.
So do you agree Odin is superior based off of feats so therefore Odin wins. If you say no you argue against yourself.
No he was shown to be. Galactus couldn't do shit against him. He didn't even try. Neither did Arishem.
OK....your point?
No. He doesn't. And you still have to prove superman is superior to galactus.
Originally posted by Black bolt zAffecting the multiverse is more impressive.
Odins most impressive feat ever is destroying a galaxy.No he was shown to be. Galactus couldn't do shit against him. He didn't even try. Neither did Arishem.
OK....your point?
No. He doesn't. And you still have to prove superman is superior to galactus.
Because he was portrayed just like Mxy powerwise wasn't able to do anything to the Ultimator. This is awesome you are arguing against yourself and don't even know it.
Galactus didn't even try so acting like his best feats wouldn't work is ludicrous.
I never said Superman and Galactus I am speaking about Odin and the Celestials.
Now answer the question does Odin beat them based on feats and can we dismiss the on panel portrayal.
Originally posted by quanchi112"Affecting" means shit unless he did something impressive to it. threatening isn't shit either.
Affecting the multiverse is more impressive.Because he was portrayed just like Mxy powerwise wasn't able to do anything to the Ultimator. This is awesome you are arguing against yourself and don't even know it.
Galactus didn't even try so acting like his best feats wouldn't work is ludicrous.
I never said Superman and Galactus I am speaking about Odin and the Celestials.
Now answer the question does Odin beat them based on feats and can we dismiss the on panel portrayal.
Considering feats and statements show mael to be stronger and feats show WF mxy to be stronger.
He didn't because he was obviously outmatched.
OK.
I never said we dismiss on panel portrayal.
Originally posted by Black bolt zIt means the power used not only affected galaxies it affected entire universes which is more impressive than destroying galaxies.
"Affecting" means shit unless he did something impressive to it. threatening isn't shit either.Considering feats and statements show mael to be stronger and feats show WF mxy to be stronger.
He didn't because he was obviously outmatched.
OK.
I never said we dismiss on panel portrayal.
It doesn't matter as feats from galactus are more impressive than Mael so portrayal means crap but you don't even know the difference and are arguing against yourself and don't even realize it.
That means he's portrayed as less powerful just like Mxy.
Yes, you did this goes along with writer's intent which you said to dismiss.