BREAKING NEWS: Sarah Palin says something.

Started by Zeal Ex Nihilo7 pages

BREAKING NEWS: Sarah Palin says something.

Everyone freaks out.

After being blamed for causing the Tucson shooting, Sarah Palin made a video in which she used the term "blood libel." Liberals then went absolutely insane--as they often do whenever Sarah Palin speaks--and went into a mentally-challenged rage full of the cheerful, hypocritical hatred they are so fond of.

Here's the text of the video.

Like millions of Americans I learned of the tragic events in Arizona on Saturday, and my heart broke for the innocent victims. No words can fill the hole left by the death of an innocent, but we do mourn for the victims’ families as we express our sympathy.

I agree with the sentiments shared yesterday at the beautiful Catholic mass held in honor of the victims. The mass will hopefully help begin a healing process for the families touched by this tragedy and for our country.

Our exceptional nation, so vibrant with ideas and the passionate exchange and debate of ideas, is a light to the rest of the world. Congresswoman Giffords and her constituents were exercising their right to exchange ideas that day, to celebrate our Republic’s core values and peacefully assemble to petition our government. It’s inexcusable and incomprehensible why a single evil man took the lives of peaceful citizens that day. Calling a murderer evil? That's an affront to moral relativism and represents the intolerance and bigotry on the Right.

There is a bittersweet irony that the strength of the American spirit shines brightest in times of tragedy. We saw that in Arizona. We saw the tenacity of those clinging to life, the compassion of those who kept the victims alive, and the heroism of those who overpowered a deranged gunman.

Like many, I’ve spent the past few days reflecting on what happened and praying for guidance. Mentions of prayer. SHE'S PROBABLY GOING TO TALK ABOUT GOD. After this shocking tragedy, I listened at first puzzled, then with concern, and now with sadness, to the irresponsible statements from people attempting to apportion blame for this terrible event.

President Reagan said, “We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.” Forcing someone to take individual responsibility!? Society failed this misunderstood man! It was probably the Tea Party with their desire to shoot up Democrats--they encouraged him to kill people! Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election.

The last election was all about taking responsibility for our country’s future. President Obama and I may not agree on everything, but I know he would join me in affirming the health of our democratic process. Two years ago his party was victorious. Last November, the other party won. In both elections the will of the American people was heard, and the peaceful transition of power proved yet again the enduring strength of our Republic. Democracy. Those stupid conservatives and their voting undermining what I want.

Vigorous and spirited public debates during elections are among our most cherished traditions. And after the election, we shake hands and get back to work, and often both sides find common ground back in D.C. and elsewhere. If you don’t like a person’s vision for the country, you’re free to debate that vision. If you don’t like their ideas, you’re free to propose better ideas. But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible. OH, HEAVENS, SHE USED THE TERM BLOOD LIBEL! THIS OFFENDS ME AND I AM TOTALLY NOT MANUFACTURING A CONTROVERSY HERE.

There are those who claim political rhetoric is to blame for the despicable act of this deranged, apparently apolitical criminal. And they claim political debate has somehow gotten more heated just recently. But when was it less heated? Back in those “calm days” when political figures literally settled their differences with dueling pistols? In an ideal world all discourse would be civil and all disagreements cordial. But our Founding Fathers knew they weren’t designing a system for perfect men and women. If men and women were angels, there would be no need for government. Our Founders’ genius was to design a system that helped settle the inevitable conflicts caused by our imperfect passions in civil ways. So, we must condemn violence if our Republic is to endure.

As I said while campaigning for others last March in Arizona during a very heated primary race, “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote.” Yes, our debates are full of passion, but we settle our political differences respectfully at the ballot box – as we did just two months ago, and as our Republic enables us to do again in the next election, and the next. That’s who we are as Americans and how we were meant to be. Public discourse and debate isn’t a sign of crisis, but of our enduring strength. It is part of why America is exceptional.

No one should be deterred from speaking up and speaking out in peaceful dissent, and we certainly must not be deterred by those who embrace evil and call it good. And we will not be stopped from celebrating the greatness of our country and our foundational freedoms by those who mock its greatness by being intolerant of differing opinion and seeking to muzzle dissent with shrill cries of imagined insults.

Just days before she was shot, Congresswoman Giffords read the First Amendment on the floor of the House. First Amendment? Not in my America! That allows hate speech! Thank God that Canada is so wonderful and pure and free unlike fascist America. It was a beautiful moment and more than simply “symbolic,” as some claim, to have the Constitution read by our Congress. I am confident she knew that reading our sacred charter of liberty was more than just “symbolic.” But less than a week after Congresswoman Giffords reaffirmed our protected freedoms, another member of Congress announced that he would propose a law that would criminalize speech he found offensive.

It is in the hour when our values are challenged that we must remain resolved to protect those values. Recall how the events of 9-11 challenged our values and we had to fight the tendency to trade our freedoms for perceived security. And so it is today.

Let us honor those precious lives cut short in Tucson by praying for them and their families and by cherishing their memories. Let us pray for the full recovery of the wounded. And let us pray for our country. In times like this we need God’s guidance and the peace He provides. DAMNIT, I KNEW SHE WAS GOING TO TALK ABOUT GOD. THIS REALLY STEAMS MY HAMS. We need strength to not let the random acts of a criminal turn us against ourselves, or weaken our solid foundation, or provide a pretext to stifle debate.

America must be stronger than the evil we saw displayed last week. We are better than the mindless finger-pointing we endured in the wake of the tragedy. We will come out of this stronger and more united in our desire to peacefully engage in the great debates of our time, to respectfully embrace our differences in a positive manner, and to unite in the knowledge that, though our ideas may be different, we must all strive for a better future for our country. May God bless America. "GOD BLESS AMERICA"? WHAT IS THIS NAZI SHIT? IF ONLY EVERYONE WAS AN ATHEIST AND MY PENIS WERE LARGER.


Bold text is (obviously) mine.

Cute statement. Fun novelty, as everything she says ends up being.

LOL Steams my hams. I'm gonna use that one.

Oh, I totally called this one. A Jewish congresswoman is shot and this ***** starts screaming that she's being "blood libeled" meaning that she is the real victim as she is an innocent being blamed by liberal Jews.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Everyone freaks out.

After being blamed for causing the Tucson shooting, Sarah Palin made a video in which she used the term "blood libel." Liberals then went absolutely insane--as they often do whenever Sarah Palin speaks--and went into a mentally-challenged rage full of the cheerful, hypocritical hatred they are so fond of.

Here's the text of the video.

Bold text is (obviously) mine.

She is a goddamn idiot. She draws up a map with crosshairs on democrats, tell her followers to help her prescribe the (final?) solution, and to "reload"...yeah would have been great if the shooter had reloaded, maybe he could have killed a couple more kids. Now we don't know whether he was inspired by her propaganda, but I don't think it matters, I'm with her on quoting Reagan “We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.”, Sarah Palin should ****ing take responsibility for inciting violence and calling for attacks (however slightly disguised), she should apologize for it and then she should be tried for it, cause it's not legal to tell people to go out and kill people (and yes, she did....SHE DID!).

The blood libel thing just shows her stupidity on top of her maliciousness, using a phrase that originated because of the severe persecution Jews faced by Christians and the fabricated lie that they killed Christian babies (unlike the correct accusation that she told her followers to shoot certain people) is in bad taste at the best of times (and this, a time a Jewish person you wanted gone having been shot, is not one). It's like pissing on someone's face after you just punched them to the ground.

Now, some of that may be hyperbole, but she should take a step back, reflect and realize that her rhetoric can and does cause violence and she should apologize for it and she should stop it in the future. Show some humility, goddammit, unless of course, she is, like I said, on top of stupid, which is a fact, just plain evil.

Please tell me you've actually seen Citizen Kane.

No, I don't watch Fox news.

😖hifty:

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Please tell me you've actually seen Citizen Kane.

Who's Citizen Kane?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Who's Citizen Kane?
Just some right-wing pundit with a talk show.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Just some right-wing pundit with a talk show.

"Pundit"? Aren't you being a bit nice?

Spoiler:
Don't tell anyone that I'm pretending to know who he is with a witty comment about his knowledge.

u mad zeal?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Who's Citizen Kane?

I just died a little inside

also, Unicron

See, Cenk on TYT probably gave the best "The Right is responsible" opinion that I have seen so far. I haven't seen anything about this guy's politics specifically, but I think it is fair to say that he hadn't read Anne Coulter's last book, and wasn't a Bill O'Riley fan.

From what we have seen, he reminds me a lot of a friend I had back in Ontario. Lets call him XX. So, XX, like the shooter in question, is anti-government and all that jazz, but also like the shooter (or so it seems), goes WAY further than that.

I actually sort of took offense to hearing people claim that being "against the government" was the same as Republicanist "Small Government", or that it meant you could be labeled a Republican. Several posters in this thread alone challange that idea, and I bet one would be hard pressed to find even a modest correlation between being "anti-state" and political violence.

So, XX is anti-state, but he is anti all parts of the state, in the same way that it seems the shooter was. Not because of politics, but because they think the state is (literally) brainwashing people, or responsible for conspiracies, or that nonsense. These are not Republican or even conservative ideas, they are simply a set of beliefs, that if someone buys into, would almost by default make them against the state in practice, rather than people like the Republicans who claim to be anti-government [sic] in principle.

This also goes a lot further in explaining the possible racist connections too. David Icke, while not being an anti-semite himself imho, does travel in a crowd with anti-semites, and his rhetoric doesn't need much interpretation to be seen as anti-jew. Alex Jones, the theocrat, says many things that border on racism, and again, it would be a very small leap from his rhetoric to anti-semitism. These people are hugely popular in both conspiracy and nazi movements, so I think that is a way better fit than is some Republican-Nazi theory (data for this paragraph from "Them: adventures with extremists" by Jon Ronson, which everyone should read today).

But then, why? Why did this guy shoot a politician and XX not? XX is totally non-violent, though, tbh, one could spin his upbrining in such a way that he would seem the "textbook" case. Further, why is there so much fear and violent paranoia surrounding politics in America? We don't see this in Canada, or anywhere else that I am aware of... Obviously the revolutionary history, but that can't be the only reason.

So what do we make of people like Palin then? I honestly don't know, but I can't imagine she is doing anything to help that violent anger that some crazies might have. Did her idiocy help motivate this shooter directly? I can't say there is any evidence of that... Did her map and crosshairs contribute to a political landscape where violence is not only seen as acceptable, but in fact encouraged? again, this would be hard to prove in any absolute way, but it seems very likely.

Originally posted by inimalist
I just died a little inside

also, Unicron

Originally posted by Bardock42

YouTube video

Lol, it's like a classy Christian Bale.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Lol, it's like a classy Christian Bale.

a drunk christian bale too

If you made Citizen Kane and had to sell Frozen Peas now, wouldn't you have a drink before?