Darth Nhilus or Darth Sion, who is stronger?

Started by Darth Nhilus2 pages
Darth Nhilus Senior Member

Darth Nhilus or Darth Sion, who is stronger?

Who do you think would win in a fight to the death, Darth Nihilus the lord of hunger or Darth Sion the lord of pain?

Zampanó The Blind Critic

Revan

Slash_KMC Retired Helper

Pain doesn't kill you, hunger eventually does.

Revan wins.

Lord Lucien Lets all love Lain

Revan.

Who is secretly Nihilus.

And Sion.

He wins.

Pwned That guy

Actually, pain can kill you. It can overload your brain into shutting things down to numb it. If you experience to much pain, eventually your brain will shut down your heart to block it out, til it overloads and just shuts down.

It takes a HUGE amount of pain, pretty much having your face tore off, sewn back on, tore off again, stapled on, and having that done to every body part.

Zampanó The Blind Critic

Okay, you're conflating proximate and ultimate causes. While the ultimate cause of this death may be the overreaction of the brain, the proximate (i.e. immediate) cause is certainly not the processing of neural signals by the brain. Rather, it is the loss of bloodflow to various (critical) parts of the body. The pain didn't kill; the heart attack killed.

Slash_KMC Retired Helper
Originally posted by Zampanó
Okay, you're conflating proximate and ultimate causes. While the ultimate cause of this death may be the overreaction of the brain, the proximate (i.e. immediate) cause is certainly not the processing of neural signals by the brain. Rather, it is the loss of bloodflow to various (critical) parts of the body. The pain didn't kill; the heart attack killed.

👆

Pwned That guy

Well, im not an expert in, well, anything. Thanks for clearing that up.

Zampanó The Blind Critic

um... that was me being a smartass, not an expert.

It's like saying the gun didn't kill someone, the bullet did. Or, to be more precise, saying that the bullet didn't kill someone, the kinetic energy transferred into the body (followed by severe blood loss) killed them.

Pwned That guy

XD

Well, the bullet does kill someone, not the gun. Also, sometimes its the shredding of vital organs, hemmoragging, etc that kills them.

Nephthys The Gr8est!!!!!!!!

YouTube video

hehknwswhtufear Restricted

post removed

darth radon naga sadow jr.

Originally posted by Pwned
Actually, pain can kill you. It can overload your brain into shutting things down to numb it. If you experience to much pain, eventually your brain will shut down your heart to block it out, til it overloads and just shuts down.

It takes a HUGE amount of pain, pretty much having your face tore off, sewn back on, tore off again, stapled on, and having that done to every body part.

you would more likely die of blood loss before yo die of pain in that situation.

Darth Piggott Sith Acolyte

I think Darth Nhilus would win, because he would just keep consuming Darth Sion's power until he gave up and died. It would proably keep Nhilus good for quite awhile with all the energy he consumes from one person.

Pwned That guy

Originally posted by darth radon
you would more likely die of blood loss before yo die of pain in that situation.
You know what? Just because not everybody can be Chuck Norris (including you) means you can go and quote anything you want!

Darth Piggott Sith Acolyte

Pain can kill you, but Darth Sion can't die from pain.

Slash_KMC Retired Helper

We've already established that pain can't kill you. You have to pay attention.

Darth Piggott Sith Acolyte

well im arguing against that, you can die from pain, I agree with pwned

Zampanó The Blind Critic

Originally posted by Darth Piggott
Pain can kill you,

Originally posted by Zampanó
Okay, you're conflating proximate and ultimate causes. While the ultimate cause of this death may be the overreaction of the brain, the proximate (i.e. immediate) cause is certainly not the processing of neural signals by the brain. Rather, it is the loss of bloodflow to various (critical) parts of the body. The pain didn't kill; the heart attack killed.

Originally posted by Slash_KMC
We've already established that pain can't kill you. You have to pay attention.

In addition, why would you adopt an extra claim when you are just going to make the character a special exception to the rule (see below)? That gives you two things to have to defend and prove, instead of just one.

Originally posted by Darth Piggott

but Darth Sion can't die from pain.

The game itself would disagree with you; KotOR II suggests that the only places where Sion is actually immortal are those steeped in the Dark side of the Force like Malachor V or Korriban.

Slash_KMC Retired Helper
Originally posted by Darth Piggott
well im arguing against that, you can die from pain, I agree with pwned
Originally posted by Zampanó
Okay, you're conflating proximate and ultimate causes. While the ultimate cause of this death may be the overreaction of the brain, the proximate (i.e. immediate) cause is certainly not the processing of neural signals by the brain. Rather, it is the loss of bloodflow to various (critical) parts of the body. The pain didn't kill; the heart attack killed.
Originally posted by Pwned
Well, im not an expert in, well, anything. Thanks for clearing that up.

Ah, so you agree with Pwned… Who is not arguing against that… But you are… And you agree with him… But he isn’t arguing it… But you are… But you also agree with him… While he isn’t arguing against it… But are arguing against it… And you also agree with him… Who isn’t arguing against it…

When will it end!!