The Unkillables vs. The Killing Machines
Thanos
Void (has no desire to die at all)
HP Doomsday
Lobo
Juggernaut (classic)
Solomon Grundy (Peak level)
Vs.
Superboy Prime (Guardian Amped)
Cyborg Superman w/ rings
Super Amazo (can't copy powers - jla only)
Classic Rulk (w/ power cosmic & energy absorbing)
Darkseid
Annihilus w/ Cosmic Rod
Re: The Unkillables vs. The Killing Machines
Originally posted by byrdgang21
Thanos
Void (has no desire to die at all)
HP Doomsday
Lobo
Juggernaut (classic)
Solomon Grundy (Peak level)Vs.
Superboy Prime (Guardian Amped)
Cyborg Superman w/ rings
Super Amazo (can't copy powers - jla only)
Classic Rulk (w/ power cosmic & energy absorbing)
Darkseid
Annihilus w/ Cosmic Rod
Originally posted by Comics Queenleaning towards something like this. I think superamazo puts it over for me though. Zantanna speech w/ flash speed is not good. Juggernaut's enchantment might go byebye as Zantanna backwards magic has pulled some pretty crazy stuff I think should be well beyond the character. HP can definitely get manhandled by GA Prime without a doubt. Solomon Grundy... This might be an issue but BFR makes this one easier than one would think IMO. Void just can't contend with a non-jobber DS who would lose to a SBP w/ GA let alone having Annihilus in the mix w/ Rod.
Thanos can be killed by Prime
HP Doomsday can be BFR'd by DS
Void can be held with Wonder Woman's lasso and made to kill himself Via Amazo
Classic Juggs can be mind raped by Amazo.
Grundy would lose to Rulk
And Lobo would lose to DS anyway or over welming numbers of whose left.
"unkillable" is used about as much as "omnipotent", "omniscient" and "all powerful" in comics. Its used a lot, but it rarely is meant to be taken literally. Fact is, many of the "unkillables" on that team, have died. "Unkillable" is more hyperbole than anything else. I've seen so many unkillable characters actually DIE in comics that word has virtually no meaning. And not only that but I wouldn't put it past a guy who can hit so hard that he can retcon another character's past to be able to punch an unkillable guy to death, or at the very least retcon him out of existence with a punch.
Hell the Juggernaut is supposed to be unstoppable, but yet, we've seen him stopped twice, and we've even seen him sent BACKWARDS once that I know of.
As one more example, the more you hit the Hulk the stronger he gets. He should be "unkillable" by physical force. Well, how did that healing factor work against Zeus? Prime's punches could kill Lobo, for example, before his healing factor can heal him. Besides, Lobo is so inconsistent, I wouldn't call him unkillable anyway.
Originally posted by PillarofOsiris
"unkillable" is used about as much as "omnipotent", "omniscient" and "all powerful" in comics. Its used a lot, but it rarely is meant to be taken literally. Fact is, many of the "unkillables" on that team, have died. "Unkillable" is more hyperbole than anything else. I've seen so many unkillable characters actually DIE in comics that word has virtually no meaning. And not only that but I wouldn't put it past a guy who can hit so hard that he can retcon another character's past to be able to punch an unkillable guy to death, or at the very least retcon him out of existence with a punch.Hell the Juggernaut is supposed to be unstoppable, but yet, we've seen him stopped twice, and we've even seen him sent BACKWARDS once that I know of.