Originally posted by quanchi112
The onus is on you. You still think someone else has to post scans just because you're too lazy to either look it up or find the comic.
Sorry. Not true. The one making the claim is the one that needs to back it up. Period.
I am not commenting on the argument at hand, just quans patently false statement.
Let's be honest busting the fabric of reality isn't that big a feat anymore.
Hulk I think has done it, Thor recently did it, Juggs has done it before.
I'm not saying those guys are as strong as SBP, but reality shattering isn't that cool anymore it doesn't mean you're gonna kill any opponent set against you.
Also I don't see anyone dropping Cain's shield in this fight, and if they did they would still have to bust Cain after wards before he you know put it up again.
Originally posted by snyper1982He did back up the claim with the issue number. You can't force someone to post scans. He provided the necessary information. He might not even have photobucket or it could be full. He backed his claim. I am right once again.
Sorry. Not true. The one making the claim is the one that needs to back it up. Period.I am not commenting on the argument at hand, just quans patently false statement.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He did back up the claim with the issue number. You can't force someone to post scans. He provided the necessary information. He might not even have photobucket or it could be full. He backed his claim. I am right once again.
Didn't you read what I wrote? I said I wasn't comment on the argument at hand... Just your false statement. You said the onus was on him, and it wasn't. Period. End of argument. Any rebuttal to that is false.
Originally posted by snyper1982He backed his claim. If he backs it it's on the poster to find the issue. Actually be clear about what it is I was saying not just jump in out of nowhere when you;re clearly wrong.
Didn't you read what I wrote? I said I wasn't comment on the argument at hand... Just your false statement. You said the onus was on him, and it wasn't. Period. End of argument. Any rebuttal to that is false.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He backed his claim. If he backs it it's on the poster to find the issue. Actually be clear about what it is I was saying not just jump in out of nowhere when you;re clearly wrong.
Seriously? You can never just admit when you are wrong... The burden of proof was NOT on him!!! You said it was. I corrected you. Period. How the eff is that wrong?
I don't care about ANYTHING else you said OTHER than the onus was on him. It wasn't. Period.
The poster making the claim has to provide some sort of evidence to back up their position. That can include issue numers in most cases.
Demanding scans from anyone is rude, not to mention stupid. Scans are not the be all and end all of arguments, and if you insist on wanting to see them, either look them up yourself, or ASK NICELY.
BBZ, if you can't be bothered to look it up yourself, then don't bother demanding them of anyone else.
Anyone arguing the pro-Juggernaut side would be wise to either mention issue numbers or post scans of the forcefield holding up to whatever attacks it can.
And on the flip-side, anyone wanting to argue that it can be breached has to post their own proof.
Otherwise all we'll have is people yelling at each other, and that will get people warned/banned.
Originally posted by snyper1982Providing issue numbers is backing up a claim as a mod just reinforced.
Seriously? You can never just admit when you are wrong... The burden of proof was NOT on him!!! You said it was. I corrected you. Period. How the eff is that wrong?I don't care about ANYTHING else you said OTHER than the onus was on him. It wasn't. Period.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Providing issue numbers is backing up a claim as a mod just reinforced.
Which has what to do with anything I have been saying? The ONLY thing I was responding to was the false claim that the onus was on him, when it was not. What part of that are you not getting? I never claimed he didn't back up what he was saying. You keep going off on tangents trying to prove a point that was never in question... I specifically said that my post had NOTHING to do with the argument at hand, and ONLY had to do with your false statement of where the burden of proof lied.
I thought it was pretty clear. If not in the first post, then surely by the second or third...
Originally posted by snyper1982I said the onus was on him to verify the claim since he already backed it with an issue number.
Which has what to do with anything I have been saying? The ONLY thing I was responding to was the false claim that the onus was on him, when it was not. What part of that are you not getting? I never claimed he didn't back up what he was saying. You keep going off on tangents trying to prove a point that was never in question... I specifically said that my post had NOTHING to do with the argument at hand, and ONLY had to do with your false statement of where the burden of proof lied.I thought it was pretty clear. If not in the first post, then surely by the second or third...
Originally posted by -Pr-I don't know where they are. Saying "they are in this thread" when the thread has 19 pages and I don't know what the scan looks like or what exactly I am looking for is not debating.
BBZ, if you can't be bothered to look it up yourself, then don't bother demanding them of anyone else.