Marvel's "DEMONSTRABLY" strongest character.

Started by psycho gundam8 pages

though he fared far better than superman did, and hulk was at his weakest hulk state

all the tech did was simulate escape velocity, something hulk can do on his own now (for at least a decade) even red hulk can do it with ease as he did with thor, and then current hulk mopped the floor with him

Originally posted by carver9
So Colossus or Wolverine can do it?
Anybody with Hulk's mass, durability and density could do it if they were fired at the rock with the same speed that Hulk was. This had a lot to do with both Hulk's jumping power and the assistance from the tech that he had to actually fire him that far into space.

Note that they wouldn't actually require the same strength as Hulk.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
though he fared far better than superman did, and hulk was at his weakest hulk state

all the tech did was simulate escape velocity, something hulk can do on his own now (for at least a decade) even red hulk can do it with ease as he did with thor, and then current hulk mopped the floor with him

when?

Originally posted by Existere
Anybody with Hulk's mass, durability and density could do it if they were fired at the rock with the same speed that Hulk was. This had a lot to do with both Hulk's jumping power and the assistance from the tech that he had to actually fire him that far into space.

Note that they wouldn't actually require the same strength as Hulk.

really? I find it unlikely. doenst the hulk weight only a few tons? and his durabilty aint that absurd either, it's HF that takes his damage soak to 11. I can accept that feat not be used as the writer didnt think all things through, but to me he seemed to desire it as a feat of strengh.

would an adamantium missile have the same effect if fired at it at the same speed?

Originally posted by 753
hum...ss flies through stars on a semi-daily basis, but no one accepts that as a feat of strengh or even bullrushing power, even though he pushes stellar masses out of his way and is unnafected by their pressure and gravity.

I hope your not being serious here. I thought it was quite obvious that the feat was intended to be one of strength but due of the nature of it, it was also by extension a feat of durability.

Flying through Stars and such are almost always feats of durability and/or speed as far as I've seen. But because of their nature, they are to a lesser extent a feat of strength.

Comparing Superman moving a planet -which is quite clear a feat of power/strength by the writer- to flying through a Star in regards to strength is quite amusing.

All strength feats are also durability feats.

Not all durability feats are strength feats.

Originally posted by Existere
Anybody with Hulk's mass, durability and density could do it if they were fired at the rock with the same speed that Hulk was. This had a lot to do with both Hulk's jumping power and the assistance from the tech that he had to actually fire him that far into space.

Note that they wouldn't actually require the same strength as Hulk.

Didn't Hulk actually punch the asteroid though?

with both arms

And his wiener.

Originally posted by Mindset
Didn't Hulk actually punch the asteroid though?
If someone gets the actual scans, we could answer that for sure- as I recall (and it was a while ago that I looked at those), he just had his arms out in front of him, Superman-flight style, and shot right through the asteroid.

I used to have the comic, but someone gave me a virus and I lost everything...pretty suspicious. sneer

?

"Not to big for The Incredible Hulk" - Classic.

Originally posted by CosmicComet

?


I hate bad art.

Edit: Where's the part where it says the asteroid was 2x Earth? Because from that scan with the perspective there it looks to be the size of a small mountain.

Probably just bad art but I'd like some clarification 😛

It's classic, I don't mind golden-silver age comic coloring.

So, the whole thing was a product of Hulk's super jumping and "experimental anti-magnetic jet propelled fortified" pseudo-science.

Originally posted by CosmicComet
It's classic, I don't mind golden-silver age comic coloring.

No the coloring is fine. It's the way the artist depicts scale that irks me.

Either Hulk is super far away from the rubble (which would make no sense considering he just wrecked it and is moving through it) or those chunks are the size of houses.

Oh scale.

Well yeah, scale is terrible even in modern animation/comics. It's just seems nigh impossible to portray effectively after a certain magnitude.

Country sized Superman ftw.

That really is just a matter of perspective, as we don't know how long the harness actually was. In Hulk's case though, he is supposed to be surrounded by the chunks of rock he had just destroyed, and close to none of them seem to be bigger than mountain size. (many of them are closer to us than Hulk is, so we can somewhat accurately interpret their size)

Iirc, the only thing that makes that asteroid twice the size of earth is a scientist at the beginning of the issue saying he has "made the calculations" after watching it through a telescope - but at no point was it depicted as being that size, either before or after Hulk hit it.

It's not a pure strength feat, either way, so there's not much to it.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
I hate bad art.

Edit: Where's the part where it says the asteroid was 2x Earth? Because from that scan with the perspective there it looks to be the size of a small mountain.

Probably just bad art but I'd like some clarification 😛

it's in the scan before that one, the asteroid is at least 1.5X the size of the earth (and apparently solid)