I am not I am just saying that some people choose to take the freedom of Religion from us the goverment for startings want to change the Pledge of Allience and change the words on the penny that says In God we trust.And little things like that.
Also in public schools teachers get mad at kids who pray and carry bibles around.
The OP is obviously suggesting that a religion can be anything you can imagine up and it would still fall under that definition. The question is where do you draw the line and say that a particular religion will not be allowed the protection of the constitution.
If a rastafarian is smoking weed per his religion he is not safe from being arrested.
Obviously anything doesn't go already.
Originally posted by The MISTER
The OP is obviously suggesting that a religion can be anything you can imagine up and it would still fall under that definition. The question is where do you draw the line and say that a particular religion will not be allowed the protection of the constitution.If a rastafarian is smoking weed per his religion he is not safe from being arrested.
Obviously anything doesn't go already.
And here I thought the OP was obviously just not thought out well. He's not making a point many of us would question. And drawing a line on religion is the same as drawing it on morality itself. But the OP doesn't frame it in those terms, it gives us a strawman example and then tells us to discuss.
srug
Originally posted by The MISTER
The OP is obviously suggesting that a religion can be anything you can imagine up and it would still fall under that definition. The question is where do you draw the line and say that a particular religion will not be allowed the protection of the constitution.If a rastafarian is smoking weed per his religion he is not safe from being arrested.
Obviously anything doesn't go already.
Yea that is kind of what I meant.But I don't know why you keep making me repect my self so whatever. 🙂