Marka Ragnos vs. Darth Nihilus

Started by axel_jovan2 pages

Marka Ragnos vs. Darth Nihilus

Location: Strip club in Las Vegas
Positions: Two opposite sides of the poker table.

Who wins?
the most powerful of the most powerful of the most powerful……
OR
the one who can destroy everything with his mere presence

Discuss.

Fvck, this is a tough one.

On the one hand, Mark A. Ragnos's death sent tremors in the Force. He is also referred to as "the most powerful of the most powerful" of the ancient Sitheverybody ever. His spirit form was capable of burning the flesh of Exar Kun and Ulic Qel-Droma, indicating that he probably could have atomized them if he felt so inclined. In addition, Mark's scepter was capable of something similar to Nihilus's Force drain, which clearly indicates that Mark himself could do so without the scepter. (For those of you who would ask, "Why would he build the damn thing if he could do it on his own?" The answer is simple: Mark likes to accessorize.) Lastly, Mark's spirit was capable of losing to Jaden Korr on Korriban, despite being equipped with the aforementioned scepter.

On the other, Darth Nihilus Force-drained an entire planet and was shown to be capable of Force-draining combatants whenever they were stunned or distractedwhenever he damn well pleases. Additionally, Colonel Tobin says he held his ship together with an application of immense telekinesis and Visas speculated that Nihilus could potentially destroy all life, which, according to Zampano's First Law of Speculative Fact, means that he can do so whenever.

The obvious conclusion is that the universe explodes.

You missed the whole symbolism about how phallic Ragnos' sceptre was and how all the Dark Side chicks wanted it. Also, he has more money, so he can afford to slip some credits into the strippers' thongs.

this was actually a very good post,and sums up the corruption of the senateforums very nicely.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
You missed the whole symbolism about how phallic Ragnos' sceptre was and how all the Dark Side chicks wanted it. Also, he has more money, so he can afford to slip some credits into the strippers' thongs.

But Mark has no legs. Therefore, he has no pants pockets. In conclusion, Mark, in fact, does not have the money with which to please the strippers.

you lose

But his ragged parka no doubt has hidden pockets, similar to how his sceptre hides a sword, a bottle opener, and no doubt an epistle depicting how he planted the seed that would become Sidious in some Tattooine slave.

There is no evidence suggesting the existence of such hidden pockets, so you lo -- oh, wait. I forgot Zampano's First Law doesn't actually require logical basis for one to claim something to be factual.

damn

Originally posted by RagingBoner
There is no evidence suggesting the existence of such hidden pockets, so you lo -- oh, wait. I forgot Zampano's First Law doesn't actually require logical basis for one to claim something to be factual.

damn

KMC Forum search shows no results for "Zampano". Therefore, your source is invalid.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
KMC Forum search shows no results for "Zampano". Therefore, your source is invalid.

Zampano's First Law says otherwise.

Source?

Zampanó needs no sources, infidel.

According to Auman's agreement theorem, the belief of a strong enough rationalist is itself evidence for that belief. Thus, obey.

First Nihilus and now Mark. It seems your mother's predisposition for being a whore is hereditary. 😂

By the way, I'm familiar with that theorem, since you used it initially to reference meGideon.

The trick is, though, you are a rhetorician, who is good at convincing people of things. I am best described as a scientist, who is good at being right. Ceteris Paribus, as the stronger rationalist my belief qualifies as stronger evidence than your belief.

😄

Originally posted by Zampanó
The trick is, though, you are a rhetorician, who is good at convincing people of things. I am best described as a scientist, who is good at being right. Ceteris Paribus, as the stronger rationalist my belief qualifies as stronger evidence than your belief.

😄

Invoking Zampanó's First Law, I proclaim myself the stronger rationalist. With that established, I will then invoke Auman's agreement theorem to conclude that I am, in fact, righter than you.

NO BACKSIEZ O SNAP wut now b1tch?

Originally posted by RagingBoner
Invoking Zampanó's First Law, I proclaim myself the stronger rationalist. With that established, I will then invoke Auman's agreement theorem to conclude that I am, in fact, righter than you.

NO BACKSIEZ O SNAP wut now b1tch?

Ragnos uses you to clean up after the mess the strippers make.

OBEY!

Originally posted by RagingBoner
Invoking Zampanó's First Law, I proclaim myself the stronger rationalist. With that established, I will then invoke Auman's agreement theorem to conclude that I am, in fact, righter than you.

NO BACKSIEZ O SNAP wut now b1tch?


It doesn't work like that. Someone has to say that you are the stronger rationalist, or else it is just empty bragging. Or is Anakin really "stronger than the Emperor, Padme"?

What you need is for someone to attest to your "prodigious intellect" before you can pull that maneuver. OBEY

Z
It doesn't work like that. Someone has to say that you are the stronger rationalist, or else it is just empty bragging. Or is Anakin really "stronger than the Emperor, Padme"?

What you need is for someone to attest to your "prodigious intellect" before you can pull that maneuver.

I think you'll find the testimony of this individual to be quite persuasive.

😂

Z
OBEY
Z, with addendum by RB
Just because you're tied at the prostate to DSJanus doesn't mean that the rest of us want to have to put up with you.

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

I can't use the forum in black mode. It hurts my eyes.