Originally posted by carver9You don't ever prove anything in fact weaker characters haven't even had their necks broken which means every time you post it it's nothing but pure ignorance and wishful thinking.
We have been through all of this already... it leads no where.Just know that WWH not WBH takes Thanos 7 or 8/10.
-You've been quanned.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusSo in turn this means you feel Hulk is greater than power gem no holds barred Thor.
Hulk.
Originally posted by Hyperion Prime
Thanos wins this. He has already shown he can hang with WM/PG Thor. Matter fact he beats Hulk like Zeus did.
Originally posted by quanchi112
-You've been quanned. So in turn this means you feel Hulk is greater than power gem no holds barred Thor.
Exactly WM/PG THOR >> WBH
Thanos wins this still.. be pretty even scraps but I believe Thanos is a better fighter, more durable and just overall higher depicted character throughout his history, which honestly should mean more than it does on this site.
When it comes down to it the way a writer and artist depict a character has more validity than how much more powerful you believe a certain character is based on unquantifiable non combat showy feats. (think WBH footsteps good example, lifting feats, writer hyperbole etc etc)
Strength I'd say is slight advantage WBH, tho Thanos can amp to any level Hulk can given time, which is something he would have plenty of due to his durability. I also don't buy the infinite Hulk strength BS hype, if it hasnt been shown on panel, he cannot reach that level, that should be black and white as far as I'm concerned.
I also can't believe people put WWH so high up also. Honestly 7 - 8 / 10 as WWH vs Thanos? cmon that fight would be a stomp in Thanos favor. I'd love to see that fight in a comic, the result would be pretty obvious to anyone that actually reads a comic, even if it is strictly H2H.
Originally posted by mykke
Thanos wins this still.. be pretty even scraps but I believe Thanos is a better fighter, more durable and just overall higher depicted character throughout his history, which honestly should mean more than it does on this site.When it comes down to it the way a writer and artist depict a character has more validity than how much more powerful you believe a certain character is based on unquantifiable non combat showy feats. (think WBH footsteps good example, lifting feats, writer hyperbole etc etc)
Strength I'd say is slight advantage WBH, tho Thanos can amp to any level Hulk can given time, which is something he would have plenty of due to his durability. I also don't buy the infinite Hulk strength BS hype, if it hasnt been shown on panel, he cannot reach that level, that should be black and white as far as I'm concerned.
I also can't believe people put WWH so high up also. Honestly 7 - 8 / 10 as WWH vs Thanos? cmon that fight would be a stomp in Thanos favor. I'd love to see that fight in a comic, the result would be pretty obvious to anyone that actually reads a comic, even if it is strictly H2H.
Excellent post!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by NihilistThanos wasn't stronger than that Drax, he was just more durable. It took both of them to destroy a planet. Actually, the planet destroyed itself. They just created a chain reaction, nothing more.
Thanos wins.The original Drax was destroying planets and ripping stars in half with his own strength, and he was nothing to a weaker pre rez Thanos...so I doubt WBH's 1 strength feat is somethong Thanos can't deal with easy
And ripping a star's core out is nothing if you can grab and hold it. All you need is the force to overcome it's gravity which is far less than you think.
Going by high showing huh? Well a far weaker Hulk has feats that trump what Drax did.
Originally posted by quanchi112All characters have low showings. Namor in water koed Hulk in one hit. That doesn't mean Namor in water is strong as average Hulk. WWH went toe to toe with Sentry, the guy who dwarfed Terrax physically, the guy who is physical peers (or above) Surfer.
Hulk's not even physically greater than the surfer so until you can prove that this isn't even close. Hulk gets the Zeus treatment.
Lastly, it is impossible for Surfer to be stronger than someone who strength is variable. Saying Surfer is physically greater than Hulk is like saying no matter how angry or strength Hulk gains, he can never be as strong as Surfer. We know that is asinine since that would imply that Surfer has infinite strength.
Originally posted by mykke
Thanos wins this still.. be pretty even scraps but I believe Thanos is a better fighter, more durable and just overall higher depicted character throughout his history, which honestly should mean more than it does on this site.When it comes down to it the way a writer and artist depict a character has more validity than how much more powerful you believe a certain character is based on unquantifiable non combat showy feats. (think WBH footsteps good example, lifting feats, writer hyperbole etc etc)
Strength I'd say is slight advantage WBH, tho Thanos can amp to any level Hulk can given time, which is something he would have plenty of due to his durability. I also don't buy the infinite Hulk strength BS hype, if it hasnt been shown on panel, he cannot reach that level, that should be black and white as far as I'm concerned.
I also can't believe people put WWH so high up also. Honestly 7 - 8 / 10 as WWH vs Thanos? cmon that fight would be a stomp in Thanos favor. I'd love to see that fight in a comic, the result would be pretty obvious to anyone that actually reads a comic, even if it is strictly H2H.
Thanos has never to proven to amp in physical strength. Yes he can create energy like brass knuckles for his fists but that is it. Even if Thanos could hypothetically amp in strength then he wouldn't, simply because he hasn't shown it to be in his character to do so. He relies more on shields and blasts and stuff.
But I agree Hulk can't get infinite strength. But the limits to his strength is beyond even Thanos.
Originally posted by h1a8Hulk doesn't have infinite strength either. He seems stronger than the Surfer but the Surfer is more durable and has already shown he was definitely up to the task of taking on the Hulk despite it being in his favor of melee combat.
All characters have low showings. Namor in water koed Hulk in one hit. That doesn't mean Namor in water is strong as average Hulk. WWH went toe to toe with Sentry, the guy who dwarfed Terrax physically, the guy who is physical peers (or above) Surfer.Lastly, it is impossible for Surfer to be stronger than someone who strength is variable. Saying Surfer is physically greater than Hulk is like saying no matter how angry or strength Hulk gains, he can never be as strong as Surfer. We know that is asinine since that would imply that Surfer has infinite strength.
Thanos has never to proven to amp in physical strength. Yes he can create energy like brass knuckles for his fists but that is it. Even if Thanos could hypothetically amp in strength then he wouldn't, simply because he hasn't shown it to be in his character to do so. He relies more on shields and blasts and stuff.
But I agree Hulk can't get infinite strength. But the limits to his strength is beyond even Thanos.
Surfer is far above Terrax as well and has been written as Galactus' top herald.
Hulk has never shown infinite strength so we debate based off of his showings which hasn't been close to infinite strength. I think Surfer's showings speak for themselves and just like the Hulk surfer can amp and has easily destroyed planets in the past due to his power so good luck trying to prove Hulk's surpasses him by leaps and bounds.
Long story short the whole tie of heroes who are in the same league Thanos is above. Get back to me when Hulk actually rapes a top tier in the same manner as Thanos has against the Surfer, physically.
Originally posted by carver9Seriously you dont have a clue, and as always make shit up. Drax was playing around for the WHOLE fight and was slapping the shit out of Hulk. Thanos never use his shields against Champ for the whole fight at all, the first part of the fight was Thanos punching Champ around(Champ only survived due to the PG backing him)...just stop lying all the time Carver it makes you look like a a idiot.
Both were playing around and when Hulk decided to get serious he got knocked out by a TP blast.They staelmated each other and Hulk fought a more powerful Drax than Thanos. Then we have Thanos admitting that Hulk=Champion w/Power Gem who he basically had to use shields against the entire fight.
Thanos won't have shields in this fight and he is fighting a MUCH more powerful Hulk than the one Thanos compared to PG Champion.
Hulk stomps.
Champions feat>>>>>>>>>>WBH feat easily.
Originally posted by h1a8He was stronger, read the early Thanos/Captain Marvell/Avengers stuff then you would undertand. He destroyed a planet on his own using his own power, got to darthgoobers Drax respect thread its in there.
[B]Thanos wasn't stronger than that Drax, he was just more durable. It took both of them to destroy a planet. Actually, the planet destroyed itself. They just created a chain reaction, nothing more.
And ripping a star's core out is nothing if you can grab and hold it. All you need is the force to overcome it's gravity which is far less than you think.😂 get your stupid real world logic out of here.
Going by high showing huh? Well a far weaker Hulk has feats that trump what Drax did.Like what.
Originally posted by Nihilist
He was stronger, read the early Thanos/Captain Marvell/Avengers stuff then you would undertand. He destroyed a planet on his own using his own power, got to darthgoobers Drax respect thread its in there.😂 get your stupid real world logic out of here.
Like what.
Prove Thanos was stronger than Drax. Drax destroyed a planetoid. In another instance a planet of unknown size and unknown amount of strikes. Gladiator destroyed at least an Earth sized planet with only a few blows.
I quantify feats, not argue against or for their validity or possibility, for this is fiction.
The PISsy feat where Hulk pulverizing an object larger than the Earth of course.
Originally posted by h1a8This is exactly why you will never catch on. If someone is superior or portrayed as such consistently to a character with strength feats then logically they are stronger/more formidable. Arguing based off of feats alone is ignorant.
Prove Thanos was stronger than Drax. Drax destroyed a planetoid. In another instance a planet of unknown size and unknown amount of strikes. Gladiator destroyed at least an Earth sized planet with only a few blows.I quantify feats, not argue against or for their validity or possibility, for this is fiction.
The PISsy feat where Hulk pulverizing an object larger than the Earth of course.
Originally posted by h1a8why don't you actually for once go and read the comics in question instead of just guessing, and there is no way I'm doing any of the ground work for you so you can discount any feat because you don't like/agree with it.
Prove Thanos was stronger than Drax. Drax destroyed a planetoid. In another instance a planet of unknown size and unknown amount of strikes. Gladiator destroyed at least an Earth sized planet with only a few blows.
I quantify feats, not argue against or for their validity or possibility, for this is fiction.it doesn't matter how you validate any feats, you are simply wrong in the way you do it, which has been proved time and time again.
The PISsy feat where Hulk pulverizing an object larger than the Earth of course.you mean when he was shot into space on rocket boosters, it helps if you understand the context first before using a feat.
Originally posted by h1a8reported
Thanos wasn't stronger than that Drax, he was just more durable. It took both of them to destroy a planet. Actually, the planet destroyed itself. They just created a chain reaction, nothing more.And ripping a star's core out is nothing if you can grab and hold it. All you need is the force to overcome it's gravity which is far less than you think.
Going by high showing huh? Well a far weaker Hulk has feats that trump what Drax did.