Solomon Grundy vs. Thanos

Started by McNasty9963 pages

Solomon Grundy vs. Thanos

Solomon Grundy(High End)

vs.

Thanos

Forum Rules except no BFR. Fight to KO, KILL, INCAPACITATION. Who wins?

thanos...i honestly dont see him getting put down by physical force alone

Pretty good fight. IIRC, Grundy at his best was able to two-shot SA Supes, so he's got some pretty damn good strength. He'd definitely give Thanos a run for his money here. If the fight gets to a slugfest, I'd give SG the edge. However, Thanos has intelligence and versatility on his side; I'd give him the majority, 7/10 or so.

If thanos has any tech at all I dont see grundy beating him

in a pure physical fight grundy would win. ANd this is takeing nothing away from thanos. PC grundy demolished pre crisis supes. Thanos is still overall more powerful,more intelligent and has his tech to aid him.

Thanos ftw provided thanos utilizes his tech and other strengths.

Thanos.

Absolute best Grundy would take avatar of death powers to beat... wonder where Thanos would find those 😖hifty:

I think in a hand-to-hand fight Solomon Grundy can take some of these, but not enough to make it matter. Thanos can take hits from Odins spear and Tyrant so I am sure he can handle earth shattering punches from Grundy. 8/10 Thanos

If Thanos uses all his powers then it's 10/10

Originally posted by Sin I AM
thanos...i honestly dont see him getting put down by physical force alone
That's because you are not logical. Energy projection durability is not the same as physical force durability. Thanos is around the same durability against physical strikes as Thor (maybe less).
Grundy doesn't have energy projection. So Thanos energy durability wouldn't do him good here.

Originally posted by h1a8
That's because you are not logical. Energy projection durability is not the same as physical force durability. Thanos is around the same durability against physical strikes as Thor (maybe less).
Grundy doesn't have energy projection. So Thanos energy durability wouldn't do him good here.
😬

Thanos is more versatile (varied powerset), more durable (as witnessed in Thanos Imperative), far more intelligent (obviously).

Thanos 9/10, if not 10/10

Thanos, easily.

h1a8 doesn't know what he talking about, Thanos durability is the same for both energy and physical attacks. If I'm wrong plz tell of all the instances of poor durability against physical/blunt force attacks

Originally posted by Nihilist
h1a8 doesn't know what he talking about, Thanos durability is the same for both energy and physical attacks. If I'm wrong plz tell of all the instances of poor durability against physical/blunt force attacks

If it is the same then u must prove it is. You must show a physical blow delivered to Thanos on the level of an Odin blast where Thanos is seemingly ok afterwards. Till then it is not.

Thor resisted Celestials beams (>>>>>Odin) and Destroyers beam (again >>>>Odin). That doesn't mean he can resisted a physical blow on the same level.

Originally posted by h1a8
That's because you are not logical. Energy projection durability is not the same as physical force durability.
👆
Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos is around the same durability against physical strikes as Thor (maybe less).
Grundy doesn't have energy projection. So Thanos energy durability wouldn't do him good here.
👇

Originally posted by h1a8
If it is the same then u must prove it is. You must show a physical blow delivered to Thanos on the level of an Odin blast where Thanos is seemingly ok afterwards. Till then it is not.

Thor resisted Celestials beams (>>>>>Odin) and Destroyers beam (again >>>>Odin). That doesn't mean he can resisted a physical blow on the same level.

Thanos took a full punch from Magus who had 5 infinity gems(and don't even say he was any more powerful than normal, the guy was merging two universes...that gives you a idea the scale of how powerful he was). He also took from Afro Magus using the soul gem amped by 25,000 Black Knights, he also took over 10 cosmic amped punches from a more powerful Thanos doppleganer...and he was fine from all 3 attacks.
Now let's have some proof from you instead of your usual bs

Originally posted by Nihilist
h1a8 doesn't know what he talking about, Thanos durability is the same for both energy and physical attacks. If I'm wrong plz tell of all the instances of poor durability against physical/blunt force attacks
No it isn't. Use your head. He absorbs energy, so energy blasts aren't as effective. Like Bishop can take a blast, but not a stab. Thanos has been stabbed before. Think before you speak ffs.

Originally posted by long pig
No it isn't. Use your head. He absorbs energy, so energy blasts aren't as effective. Like Bishop can take a blast, but not a stab. Thanos has been stabbed before. Think before you speak ffs.
don't talk stupid Long Turd, because he absorbs energy doesn't mean energy attacks have less effect at all, and there is nothing to support that theory. IF you have anything to prove me wrong then post it, and if it was the case regarding energy attack why doesn't Thanos simply absorb the energy attacks then.
Oh and lol at using Wolverine stabbing Thanos when he was using adamantium, Gamora recently tried to stab Thanos with the God Slayer and it broke on his skin.(So trying to use. Logans stabbing as a average is laughable.

Don't be stupid. Or at least try and not be stupid. If you're an ambient energy absorber, like Thanos, Strange, Bishop, Havock....etc, you won't get the full effect of a blast. Your body will automatically absorb some of it. Your point was if your body handles an energy blast one way, it can handle a physical assault just as good. That's just retarded and you know it. Thanos's durability is based around molecular control. Almost a fluidity to his durability. It changes. But yeah, he can be stabbed by a normal person. But he also can brace himself and tank MASSIVE damage. But the point is you're wrong. I'm right. You're dumb. I'm smart.

Thanos nutt huggers like nihilist need to just stop. Jesus christ.