Originally posted by Liberator
I suppose, but Olympic accomplishments are different than killing 30 people accomplishments.
in what way? this isn't a serial murderer we are talking about here, this person didn't initiate the war, he is simply good at combat, yet because you don't agree with war, you don't think it is worth pointing out their skill.
this is quite literally the same as me saying michael phelps is an unimpressive swimmer because the Olympics are a thinly veiled excuse for racism and nationalism.
Originally posted by Liberator
I just can't respect something like that.
what would you have found more respectable? if the man was a poor soldier? if he refused to fight and endangered his unit? it seems like you are being harsh on an individual for the choices of their state.... which is cool, but would be exactly like me saying michael phelps is a bad swimmer because America sucks.