Originally posted by Q99
In addition to brand name, there are specific Sith teachings and knowledge.All the Sith orders can trace their teaching lineage back to the Hundred Years Darkness and the Sith that came from there in one way or another. Whether direct teacher-student lines, or in a few cases studying at the feet of holocrons of past Sith masters.
Sort of like how a random female darksider could claim to be a Nightsister, but unless she learned their style of magic, she's really not one and is just using the name.
Ventress claimed to be a Sith, but she had no training from anyone with Sith history at the time, she just combined Nightsister and Jedi training.
I agree with you entirely except for this bit...
Originally posted by Q99
Once she had some training with Dooku, she could more legitimately claim the title as she now had proper Sith teachings
Dooku didn't give her Sith teachings, just basic dark side techniques. This is shown in Yoda: Dark Rendezvous:
D: Have I not taught you many secrets?
V: Scraps. Little devices. Leser arts. Not nearly what you would if I were your apprentice sworn in blood.
Other than that you hit the nail right on the head.
Originally posted by Galan007
"Dark Jedi" is a term spawned out of necessity. After all, if Ventress, Sora Bulq, Quinlan Vos, Savage Opress, etc. would have all been dubbed "Sith", instead of "dark Jedi", it would have directly violated the rule of two- a rule Palpatine obviously abided by.In short: it was essentially a way to introduce more dark side adepts to the mythos, without screwing up Sith continuity.
Not really. The term Dark Jedi was used long before the whole Rule of Two thing was ever heard of.
Brakiss and the Shadow Academy trainees for example were referred to as Dark Jedi.