How does evolution explain males and females?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
God is Buddhahood, and it would be silly to worship Buddhahood.

Do you believe in trees? Then Why would you worship trees?

Some people do.

I don't, but some people do.

Prerogative?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f80/t587086.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=586713&pagenumber=7#post14512113

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510871 (click here if you can handle the Truth)

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510888

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f80/t587049.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14510387#post14510387

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14510685#post14510685

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510714

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510772

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Given the advantages of asexual reproduction, how (or why) did sexual reproduction originate? Why is sexual reproduction the predominate method?

This is the most ridiculous uninformed opinion on the subject I have ever seen.

Asexual production does not give genetic diversity, which is necessary for everything from robust immune systems to not having polydactylism.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
This is the most ridiculous uninformed opinion on the subject I have ever seen.

Asexual production does not give genetic diversity, which is necessary for everything from robust immune systems to not having polydactylism.

But you haven't answered the question.

How does evolutionary theory account for males and females?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f80/t587086.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=586713&pagenumber=7#post14512113

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510871 (click here if you can handle the Truth)

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510888

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f80/t587049.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14510387#post14510387

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14510685#post14510685

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510714

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510772

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
But you haven't answered the question.

How does evolutionary theory account for males and females?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f80/t587086.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=586713&pagenumber=7#post14512113

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510871 (click here if you can handle the Truth)

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510888

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f80/t587049.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14510387#post14510387

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=14510685#post14510685

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510714

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=587086&pagenumber=1#post14510772

I did. I said you lack a fundamental understanding of the concept, and your assertion that asexual production is superior lacks evidence. The onus of evidence is on you to prove that asexual division is better than sexual reproduction (which is laughable, really).

Also, stop reposting your links when you reply to me. It's the height of ridiculousness.

Most of the life on this planet reproduces by a-sexuality. Male and female is a relatively new phanomina.

"How does evolutionary theory account for males and females?"
Why would evolution account? This question is like "how does my kitchen account for heating food?" The question makes no sense.

Why are there so many conditions and diseases now tho?

Is it because advancements in medicine can easier detect them.

Is it because bad traits are more prevalently being passed on because you don't need to be the "fittest" to survive.

A combination of these two.

Or none of the above?

Originally posted by Raisen
Why are there so many conditions and diseases now tho?

Is it because advancements in medicine can easier detect them.

Is it because bad traits are more prevalently being passed on because you don't need to be the "fittest" to survive.

A combination of these two.

Or none of the above?

Try 7 billion people on the planet.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Try 7 billion people on the planet.

There wouldn't be that many unless medicine helped the "unfit" to survive and pass on their "unfit" genes.

so we're defying nature?

creating an unsustainable amount of people?

Quite possibly. Since the majority of First-World governments are profit-driven, it's unlikely a feasible world-wide solution will ever exist.

Unless it's a form of eradication. Also, it's funny how politicians are split over the issue of global warming, but the majority of the scientific community is aware of it and saddened by our lack of involvement in that area.

But replacing coal, oil and nuclear power doesn't create wealth for the upper class, so GL with it ever happening.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Quite possibly. Since the majority of First-World governments are profit-driven, it's unlikely a feasible world-wide solution will ever exist.

Unless it's a form of eradication. Also, it's funny how politicians are split over the issue of global warming, but the majority of the scientific community is aware of it and saddened by our lack of involvement in that area.

But replacing coal, oil and nuclear power doesn't create wealth for the upper class, so GL with it ever happening.

This is a good topic, but it is in the wrong thread, and the wrong forum.

Originally posted by Raisen
Why are there so many conditions and diseases now tho?

Is it because advancements in medicine can easier detect them.

Is it because bad traits are more prevalently being passed on because you don't need to be the "fittest" to survive.

A combination of these two.

Or none of the above?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Evolution is a theory, and lie.

No, evolution is not perfect, but it is not a lie. Christianity, now that is a lie.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Evolution is a theory, and lie.

Have you got proof of this, or is it just because you don't understand it?

Originally posted by Stealth Moose

Have you got proof of this, or is it just because you don't understand it?

The proof is the beautifully designed world around you.

Life, order, nature, fixed laws, principles, mathematics, philosophy, physics, chemistry, science, and other 'ologies and disciplines cannot proceed from a random, chaotic event.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The proof is the world around you.

That is a weak proof, if at all. You have made an extraordinary claim, that requires an extraordinary proof. If you need help determining what an extraordinary proof is, I can give you some examples.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose

Have you got proof of this, or is it just because you don't understand it?

Life can only come from life.

This is a scientific fact.

The Bible reveals that God is living.

All life came from God, not an impossible organic soup that cannot even be duplicated with the most advanced laboratories in a controlled environment.

Let that sink down into your hearing.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Life can only come from life.

This is a scientific fact.

The Bible reveals that God is living.

All life came from God, not an impossible organic soup.

Life can only come from life is NOT a scientific fact. Science does not know how life stated.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Life can only come from life is NOT a scientific fact. Science does not know how life stated.

The scientific fact that life has only been observed to come from life is a scientifiic fact.

This empirically established fact is so entrenched in the scientific community that this concept is referred as the Law of Biogenesis.

Life has never been observed to come from non-living matter.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The scientific fact that life has[b] only been observed to come from life is a scientifiic fact.

This empirically established fact is so entrenched in the scientific community that this concept is referred as the Law of Biogenesis. [/B]

You are talking about one example out of how many stars in our galaxy, and how many galaxies in the universe. Your sample rate to too low to draw that conclusion. Therefore , it is not a scientific fact.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are talking about one example out of how many stars in our galaxy, and how many galaxies in the universe. Your sample rate to too low to draw that conclusion. Therefore , it is not a scientific fact.

That one example was enough to explode evolution, and expose it for what it is: a lie from the devil.