all these questions i am asking are from a devil's advocate point of view btw, i am not asking from a personal view
well, yes, that is the point...
politicians use the specter of terrorism to push through their policy ambitions
this is true
they release frequent reports that are normally completely ignored by the political establishment
there is no way of knowing whether what the CIA says is truth or fiction given their history
only way to know is if you are actually part of the CIA and high ranking as well
there is certainly no credible evidence that AQ has thousands of members though
there is no evidence that there is 1 member, 100 members or 1 million members
all we know is what we get told
the short answer is that AQ proper was all but destroyed in the initial invasion of Afghanistan
the terror attacks you see in the west now are almost uniformly perpetrated by home grown islamists, something which North America has a little bit of natural protection against. The reason for this is that most North American countries don't define themselves by a single identity, but rather as a tolerant group of multiple ethnicities, and therefore, it is easier for immigrants to feel as though they belong to the society. There is also the fact that europe is closer than north america to these muslim nations, and therefore the immigrants who tend to come to NA from those places generally have more money and can thus integrate better into society.
i am asking about terrorists not multiculturalism and integration
probably, but not all terrorists are part of AQ. there are more jewish and christian terrorists in America than islamists, however, environmental and leftist terrorism takes the largest share of terrorist activities in the states
statistically speaking, you have much more to worry about from the children of god or the animal liberation front than you do AQ
i am not interested at this time about other terrorists, i am only interested in the terrorists who the government said attacked america on 9/11, other terrorist organisations are irrelevant to my questions
because it isn't really easy to do, especially in a climate where the authorities are very sensitive to these matters
look at the failed times square attack. They nabbed the guy because a store clerk thought it was weird he bought a large amount of nail polish remover
instead of looking at a failed case that media picked up and ran with, i want to look at why there have been no successful attacks on america
not even small scale attacks
terrorist attack is actually easy, especially by someone who has no fear of being caught or death
i am in the uk and if i was a nutcase it would be so easy for me to carry out a terrorist attack all by myself, in USA it would be even easier due to the prevalence of weapons for sale
there is also the fact that muslims in America have been incredibly cooperative with the police, and have informed frequently on the suspicious activities of their neighbours.
well that covers the retarded terrorists who say to their neighbour "hey am gonna buy a gun tomorrow and kill some infidels" what about the terrorists who are organised and not retarded, the type who carried out 9/11 according to government
?
lol, 2003 just called, they're wondering where you have been for 8 years
?
dont be smart arse