Wrath of the Titans

Originally posted by Stoic
The problem with these epic type of films is that they look great right up until the actors begin speaking. If films are supposed to be centered around an archaic era, you would expect them to at least use archaic English (Thou,Thee, Ye, Nay..etc). Conan failed because of the same issue.

Then check out the original Clash Of The Titans then.

YouTube video

A much better trailer.

That Lava Creature looks awesome.

Perseus is gonna use Zeus' thunder? I think that could be a geekasm moment fo shiz

I'm big fan of gods related movie.
Thank you so much for sharing.

Lots of hi-res images... clicky in case you care more than I do. 😐

People better not be getting hyped up.....remember what happen with the first movie.

It looks like some of the visuals might be somewhat entertaining, and hopefully Liam Neeson will have a better look and better lines. Don't worry, even though it looks better than the first one, I still think it looks like crap.

First one was absolute, dirty balls. I have no interest or faith that this one will be anything more than another disposable cgi thrill ride, posing as a movie that has no substance. Want to see a good and mature modern day, Clash of the titans? If so, then go watch, The immortals, instead. That movie is gold.

The immortals sucked dick.

The best "modern" greek legend movies are troy and 300.

(lol) to the comment above. I watched both movies and the Titans offered more of a back story rather then a pure action thrill ride.

The immortals was good however, offered more of a look into the world of the gods but I was still displeased. When the first trailers to both movies came out they made it seem that it was going to be a movie about the gods, but it was about a "demigod". I expected the movie to show more into the life of the gods.."more into their world more into their power." Both movies did not offer this aspect, therefore I was not satisfied. When the movie trailer to immortals came out, it had that magnificant scene where the gods are fighting in the clouds but if you watched it, its only one short min where they are actually fighting and it turns out to be more of a thought.

I dont expect anything for the wrath of the titans then to be an action seeking thrill ride, I hold caution to the wind that the producers of this movie have actually given thought to a good story.

Remember - this was directed by the man who brought us Battle: Los Angeles. 😘
If the first one was barely passable, then there is little hope for this one.

Both Immortals and Clash were terrible films.

Originally posted by Stoic
The problem with these epic type of films is that they look great right up until the actors begin speaking. If films are supposed to be centered around an archaic era, you would expect them to at least use archaic English (Thou,Thee, Ye, Nay..etc). Conan failed because of the same issue.

Clash of the Titans and Wrath is set around ancient Greece (mythology), so no English.

Conan was set in the Hyborian age, which is a fictional age created by Robert E. Howard. No "Thous or Thees" needed, bro.

Originally posted by the ninjak
Both Immortals and Clash were terrible films.

Clash of the Titans was bad, yes (and funny). But don't talk shit about Immortals. If nothing else, it is at least visually spectacular and the music is very immersive. 😠

Immortals sucked, brah. You're like one of 10 people on the planet that liked it.

Not as hard as your mom sucked last night.

Let us be gentlemen and get off the mothers; I just got off of yours?

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Clash of the Titans was bad, yes (and funny). But don't talk shit about Immortals. If nothing else, it is at least visually spectacular and the music is very immersive. 😠

You are clearly a false prophet, because his name is Dafoe Christ. Our film savior. Except Antichrist.. yeesh, that movie freaked me out.. 😘