King of Tears Vs Atum

Started by Prep-Man1 pages

King of Tears Vs Atum

vs

Eh. I like KOT better.

But I wouldn't really argue if someone backed Atum here.

KOT is kind of hard to place.

He did own Spectre, right? Plus, he's immortal, cannot be truly destroyed.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
He did own Spectre, right? Plus, he's immortal, cannot be truly destroyed.

After Spectre owned him the first time around, yeah.

KOT is Skyfather+, maybe Elder God level. I just don't know if Atum would be able to absorb him like he did Mephisto and Hela and the others. I want to say no but really there's no telling if it would work or not.

KOT

Originally posted by Omega Vision
After Spectre owned him the first time around, yeah.

KOT is Skyfather+, maybe Elder God level. I just don't know if Atum would be able to absorb him like he did Mephisto and Hela and the others. I want to say no but really there's no telling if it would work or not.

How did Spectre own him the first time? Wasn't that Corrigan?

Owning Spectre is a nebulous feat. Context and interpretation are usually very subjective, because sometimes he's the 2nd most powerful entity in the DCU, other times he can get punked by Sub-Skyfathers.

I don't know this guy, but he would need more than that to solidify his placement.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
How did Spectre own him the first time? Wasn't that Corrigan?
It was Hal, iirc.

Atum is a beast. I dunno if KOT has what it takes. Though, admittedly I don't know enough about him to judge this.

Originally posted by Digi
Owning Spectre is a nebulous feat. Context and interpretation are usually very subjective, because sometimes he's the 2nd most powerful entity in the DCU, other times he can get punked by Sub-Skyfathers.

I don't know this guy, but he would need more than that to solidify his placement.


On what occasions has Spectre been punked by a sub-skyfather without a plot device involved?

Don't know enough about KOT.