OneDumbG0
Find Your Own Fire
Originally posted by CosmicComet
The problem is, the speed difference truly would make such a thing objectively arguable, even if its obvious that in a comic it would not be portrayed that way.
No, it wouldn't be objectively arguable. Because I've seen no evidence or any indication that Superman would destroy 1,000,000 Mongul Jrs. or 1,000,000 Lobos, or 1,000,000 fodder GLs in a single second. And Marvel superspeedsters like Gladiator, Hermes or Hyperion haven't demonstrated the capacity to similarly destroy 1,000,000 Thors either. If it's so obvious that a comic would never portray that, maybe it's obvious that such feats are beyond their capabilities rather than characters being neutered by editorial.
I've seen him stretch 1 second into 10 minutes. Rebuild a city under ambiguous circumstances. And pretty much fail at destroying his first Imperiex probe with combat superspeed and ultimately resorting to a focused superstrong barrage of heat/ice breath on a single focal point.
Originally posted by h1a8
If Superman is many many times stronger than Thor (by feats) then it makes no since (other than bias) to say he is Thor's equal in strength.Superman has the speed to make them statues. How can a statue beat you if it can't even move?
Superman has the speed to make human beings look like statues and watch Flash eat a piece of pie.
Human beings =/= Thor =/= 1,000,000 Thors. Watching Flash eating pie =/= blitzing Thor with 1,000,000 punches =/= blitzing 1,000,000 Thors into unconsciousness.
Originally posted by Batman-Prime
And ODG. Yes he did but he took two of the best, now imagine Thor with Supermans powers, against the weaker Worthy (except Juggs).
No. After exhausting the Thor half of his powers against Worthy Hulk and Worthy Thing, I'll imagine Superman swinging Mjolnir and Cap's shield against 6 Thor level beings.
And I'd imagine that he'd get wrecked horribly.