Originally posted by Toshi
No not at all. He could've put up a fight pre-nerf but now he sucks.
Lovely, now if Drew still made Revan a god, we'll have a merry time deciding how powerful the dude is.
The only thing is that he's been weakened after 300 years and may not be as powerful as he was before his captivity.
Drew was already dead set in nerfing him so I doubt we'll have any conflicts. Satele Shan better be Luke NJO esque in a book soon because this is annoying. I should finish the game before complaining but still. The Sith get an Emperor that's 1300 years old, Malgus who's god modded and they can kill Revan.
Originally posted by Korto Vos
Lovely, Malgus, son of Malak, is an OP beast much powerful than the party that just killed Revan, even though a Republic soldier and Satele took care of him rather easily before.
That's me speculating but in the book they had him talk about unseating the Emperor AND the Dark Council. They wouldn't write a book on that only for it not to reflect on the story.
Originally posted by Korto Vos
Lovely, Malgus, son of Malak, is an OP beast much powerful than the party that just killed Revan, even though a Republic soldier and Satele took care of him rather easily before.
I never heard of a link between Malak and Malgus, although if there were, it would be ironic given his place as destroyer of the Jedi Temple and his bit in leading the Sith players on the Foundry mission.
I don't get that Malgus is OP, but he follows the way of the Juggernaut, which, according to the official website, is the Way of Marka Ragnos. I find it amusing that the Sith Emperor is seemingly disowned by the Ancients, but uses their teachings and names to give his empire heritage. Malgus' primary ability is unyielding rage and strong power in the Force, and this may make him a more formidable foe than a Jedi who has been drained for 300 years, regardless of natural talent.
We also don't know how close in power Revan would be against Malgus or the Sith Emperor at this point, since betrayal implies any battle plan was completely undermined.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I never heard of a link between Malak and Malgus, although if there were, it would be ironic given his place as destroyer of the Jedi Temple and his bit in leading the Sith players on the Foundry mission.I don't get that Malgus is OP, but he follows the way of the Juggernaut, which, according to the official website, is the Way of Marka Ragnos. I find it amusing that the Sith Emperor is seemingly disowned by the Ancients, but uses their teachings and names to give his empire heritage. Malgus' primary ability is unyielding rage and strong power in the Force, and this may make him a more formidable foe than a Jedi who has been drained for 300 years, regardless of natural talent.
We also don't know how close in power Revan would be against Malgus or the Sith Emperor at this point, since betrayal implies any battle plan was completely undermined.
I was joking LOL...
...seriously, couldn't they design somebody who doesn't look like Malak Jr with the whole mask on his face.
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I think the better question is, why would anyone put Vader above a Sith lord who's holocron was so full of powerful secrets and rituals that it made Darth "I eat sith lightning and shit a new order" Bane literally a fanboy?Could just be me though.
But the best question is undoubtedly why would anyone put a guy who was a Sith Lord for, what, three years? above another guy who was even more powerful in the Force and a Sith Lord for around twenty five, who has a vastly more impressive array of abilities and skills, and was the disciple of history's most learned Sith?
I'm all for giving older Force users their due credit, but this paradigm has always perplexed me and likely will continue for the foreseeable future.
Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
But the [b]best question is undoubtedly why would anyone put a guy who was a Sith Lord for, what, three years? above another guy who was even more powerful in the Force and a Sith Lord for around twenty five, who has a vastly more impressive array of abilities and skills, and was the disciple of history's most learned Sith?I'm all for giving older Force users their due credit, but this paradigm has always perplexed me and likely will continue for the foreseeable future. [/B]
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Made this for you, Escape!
Wrong guy, Lucius is the one who really liked Loki from Thor. 😬
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I think the better question is, why would anyone put Vader above a Sith lord who's holocron was so full of powerful secrets and rituals that it made Darth "I eat sith lightning and shit a new order" Bane literally a fanboy?Could just be me though.
This, so much.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Its from The Old Republic. Spoilers.
You, PM the spoilers. NOW.
The true question is what did Revan actually learn during his 5 year journey in the Unknown Regions with Malak? We do know he discovered the thought bomb ritual, plundered the dark secrets of Malachor V, scared Ajunta Pall into surrendering to him, led Republic forces to victory over the Mandalorians and caused the Jedi Council to wipe his memory. Darth Bane even stated that Revan knew powers and techniques that he would not dare to attempt due to the fact they were so dangerous. Traya stated that looking at Revan was like looking into the heart of the Force.
Revan knew that knowledge was power not just mayhem and destruction. The difference between Vader and Revan is that Anakin/Vader was mentally unstable. Another question is could Anakin/Vader survived the final battle at Malachor V without becoming a wound in the Force like the Exile?