siriuswriter
Senior Member
Sorry for double posting, I didn't have time for my short review earlier.
I rate The Hunger Games 3/5, and that's because I read the books, so could fill in the gaps [of which there were many] so I don't know how confused people are who haven't read the books.
Turning a first-person book into an ensemble film reeaallly doesn't work very well.
Positive - Setting/Authenticity to Setting.
They did the Capitol very well, it was exactly like "The Wizard of Oz," coming from very dreary District 12 to the colorful, zany world of the Capitol.
Positive - Music.
This is more of a neutral, but there was some good music in there.
Positive -Direction
Except for
Spoiler:
the night rising early and the crazy shot-shot-shot-shot on top of the Cornucopia. I liked that style when the first twelve [and thirteenth] kids were picked off, it was a study in deadliness.
Negative - Performances.
This goes back to the book being first person. How were we supposed to know what they were thinking about when they're trying to stay quiet for the other players, vague for the camera, and holding in emotion for each other?
Negative - Plot
What - when? How - why? Again, it helped that I read the books.
So there we go. 3/5