Re: A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet
Originally posted by FortitudeYou're welcome. Borbarad's finest. That I know of.
...in one huge battle, all FTL disabled. Assume Saxtonite calculations. 馃槃
Originally posted by Korto VosTsk tsk. You need to get up to date with terminology.
LOL I thought he meant the [B]Trade Federation... [/B]
Re: Re: A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
You're welcome. Borbarad's finest. That I know of.
That was complete ownage. Especially given the disturbing stupidity of the pro Trek side, not understanding the difference between "joules" and "watts" and quoting Darkstar as a reliable source. 馃槅
But I have no idea why Battlestar or Lord of the Rings would be included in the thread. The latter is completely and totally useless (barring the Valar or Eru himself) and the former's yield calcs are at least five orders of magnitude below Star Wars, and even lower than darkstar's SW calcs.
Originally posted by Korto Vos
I'm sure an entire fleet can destroy one ship...
That would be equivalent to claiming that the entire Spanish Armada can destroy a single aircraft carrier, cause hey, it's an entire fleet versus a single ship! 馃檮
False Edit: Oh, you misunderstood. My bad.
Re: Re: Re: A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet
Originally posted by FortitudeThe guy who made that thread, HWKN, was one of the stupidest, self-victimizing douches ever to traverse this place. But Rudy's gone now.
That was complete ownage. Especially given the disturbing stupidity of the pro Trek side, not understanding the difference between "joules" and "watts" and quoting [b]Darkstar as a reliable source. 馃槅But I have no idea why Battlestar or Lord of the Rings would be included in the thread. The latter is completely and totally useless (barring the Valar or Eru himself) and the former's yield calcs are at least five orders of magnitude below Star Wars, and even lower than darkstar's SW calcs.[/B]