A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet

Started by Fortitude1 pages

A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet

...in one huge battle, all FTL disabled. Assume Saxtonite calculations. 馃槃

I'm sure an entire fleet can destroy one ship...

Re: A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet

Originally posted by Fortitude
...in one huge battle, all FTL disabled. Assume Saxtonite calculations. 馃槃
You're welcome. Borbarad's finest. That I know of.

The Destroyer solos. Obviously.

LOL I thought he meant the Trade Federation...

Originally posted by Korto Vos
LOL I thought he meant the [B]Trade Federation... [/B]
Tsk tsk. You need to get up to date with terminology.

So much ownage...

Indeed. Borbarad is a little..... intense.

To be fair, the other guys were pretty much asking to be pwned...

Jaden was always a bit of a dick. Oddly enough, his presence at KMC diminished after that thread.

Its always hard to recover from a Borbarad surprise butt-sex. ****er comes out of nowhere and reams you.

Re: Re: A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
You're welcome. Borbarad's finest. That I know of.

That was complete ownage. Especially given the disturbing stupidity of the pro Trek side, not understanding the difference between "joules" and "watts" and quoting Darkstar as a reliable source. 馃槅

But I have no idea why Battlestar or Lord of the Rings would be included in the thread. The latter is completely and totally useless (barring the Valar or Eru himself) and the former's yield calcs are at least five orders of magnitude below Star Wars, and even lower than darkstar's SW calcs.

Originally posted by Korto Vos
I'm sure an entire fleet can destroy one ship...

That would be equivalent to claiming that the entire Spanish Armada can destroy a single aircraft carrier, cause hey, it's an entire fleet versus a single ship! 馃檮

False Edit: Oh, you misunderstood. My bad.

Re: Re: Re: A single ISD2 vs the entire Federation Starfleet

Originally posted by Fortitude
That was complete ownage. Especially given the disturbing stupidity of the pro Trek side, not understanding the difference between "joules" and "watts" and quoting [b]Darkstar as a reliable source. 馃槅

But I have no idea why Battlestar or Lord of the Rings would be included in the thread. The latter is completely and totally useless (barring the Valar or Eru himself) and the former's yield calcs are at least five orders of magnitude below Star Wars, and even lower than darkstar's SW calcs.[/B]

The guy who made that thread, HWKN, was one of the stupidest, self-victimizing douches ever to traverse this place. But Rudy's gone now.

Lucien is correct, HWKN really had no clue what he was talking about 95% of the time.