When Luke is at his best...

Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
An insinuation and an accusation are two entirely different animals, DS. As I said, having a high opinion of one's self (which is what you accused me of) does not indicate lack of productivity.

Aren't you in law school? 😬

I don't need to prove their validity. They're statements from a canon source; they're valid until there is an obvious contradiction and here there is none. Pretty clumsy backpedaling there.

facepalm

DS
whether its an insinuation or accusation is irrelevant

DS
Both responses accuse the other of being useless on this forum, therefore my remark was correct.

^ Here you claim that your remark was an accusation, when it was not. It was you who introduced the "irrelevant" notion to begin with, and worse, you got it wrong. 😬

DS
but I appreciate the misdirection.

I appreciate the tenacity you exhibit in your own defeat, speaking of Nai's handbook. Your insult failed as spectacularly as your argument.

facepalm

DS
since there is nothing confining Nadd to anything, unless you plan on hiding behin the word 'temporary', looks like the comic proves you wrong. Feel free to take a page out of the old Nai handbook and typing until the other party stops caring.

Multiple sources confirm that Nadd's spirit was anchored to his remains. If you don't like it, take it up with the authors of the various texts. But there is no contradiction, because the source material (comic) and the text themselves allow for both facts to exist cooperatively: Like Ragnos, Nadd was capable of transporting his essence across space to various locations outside of his tomb while still being ultimately anchored there and unable to roam indefinitely.

Or you can continue to operate under the vivid delusion that you are, somehow, the arbiter of canon and can disregard multiple sources on a whim.

It ultimately makes no difference to me: My point remains as firm and erect as my penis was during the licentious sexcapades that ensued with your girlfriend and your mother last night. innuendur

Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
[B]^ Here you claim that your remark was an accusation, when it was not. It was you who introduced the "irrelevant" notion to begin with, and worse, you got it wrong. 😬

DS
I appreciate you continuing the moot point because it doesn't change the validity of remark. And your post is nice considering I've already allowed you to admit defeat and move on but I enjoy reading irrelevant posts and hail marys🙂

👇

Well, when the remark is valid and you try to hide behind a cloak of irrelevance, you know it's time to move on.

DS
Well, when the remark is valid and you try to hide behind a cloak of irrelevance, you know it's time to move on.

No one said anything about the remark being invalid. 😬

I worry about you, my friend, and your future in law. I have a gut feeling that the bar is going to clothesline you.

haermm

Originally posted by Turr_Phennir
No one said anything about the remark being invalid. 😬

I worry about you, my friend, and your future in law. I have a gut feeling that the bar is going to clothesline you.

haermm

Also , for someone who spent 2 pages arguing that my remark was invalid and I didn't know what it meant, you sure have a short term memory🙂

DS
Thats ok, I would worry more if someone 9 years my junior actually corrected me

Your years on KMC must have been agonizingly stressful, then. 😬

DS
but since the point is hidden within a bunch of irrelevant nonsense, I think you just might have a career in law. That is after you educate yourself in semantics.

DS
Also , for someone who spent 2 pages arguing that my remark was invalid and I didn't know what it meant, you sure have a short term memory

facepalm

I arguedproved the remark was inappropriate, not that it wasn't valid. It was not relevant to what was being discussed: productivity in the realm of discourse. That I may or may not have an inflated opinion of myself is ultimately irrelevant to my activity and skill within an actual debate. It's a little disheartening to see that you haven't caught on. So this is what two years of unending trolling does to you? 😬

I guess someone needs a lesson in the difference of inappropriate and nonsensical as it relates to validity, not even realizing that not only was it appropriate but 100% correct. I suggest you lay off the pot and Friday night WoW sessions as it's affecting your grasp of the English language🙂

WoW and pot are no friends of mine (but your mom is) and the remark was still inappropriate and the sources still stand, my love. 😬

The sources are disproved and 'inappropriate' is another way of saying my remark is invalid in this specific context. I win.

DS
The sources are not disproved and 'inappropriate' is another possible way of saying my remark is invalid but not in this specific context. I winlose.

👆

Well said.

he

Looks like I win, time to look at victory porn.

I thought you were married. mmm

DS
Looks like I winlose, time to look at victoryconsolation porn.

I left the sex tape of your mother and I in the VCR. Enjoy!

Engagement doesn't preclude one from watching porn, especially victory porn.

Does she know about your consolation porn?

She will have to accept it. Does your life partner?

We watch it together.

That's.... Gay