Re: Thors Hammer Vs Adamantium Vs Juggernaut
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
Now that its been made clear that skyfathers can destroy adamantium (king thor,the serpent,zeus all have) which is more durable
Juggernaut is more durable (non disputable) then comes adamantium then Thor's hammer.
My reasoning of why adamantium is stronger than Mjolnir is because we have seen plenty of times where the hammer broke, got cracked, or split in half, by forces adamantium should be able to take. Second, King Thor denting the shield with a less durable object is logical since the area of the strike was smaller the area of the shield and the thickness of the hammer was much larger than the thickness of the shield. If the roles were reversed then easily Thor with an adamantium hammer (like Hercules's mace) could dent a thin uru shield.
Re: Re: Thors Hammer Vs Adamantium Vs Juggernaut
Originally posted by Power Cosmic IICorrect. It may be possible that adamantium is stronger than Cap's shield. But King Thor did warp Wolverine's skeleton. But CA's shield simply got broke into pieces. So adamantium wins there.
are you referring to cap's shield? It's not made of adamantium
Originally posted by rotiart
Cap did have one made of adamantium before... I believe he said the balance felt off...I think protocide and John walker as us agent wielded adamantium ones too.
The only thing Serpent has done of note is break cap's shield...serpent is in this thread...but cap's shield is not adamantium...