Why do we NEED to reproduce?

Originally posted by alltoomany
animals in natural settings are INCAPABLE of resisting, not true for humans

There may well have been organisms in the past with no genetic impetus to reproduce. Needless to say, that's why they are not around today. As living things, they failed in a big way.

Originally posted by Mindship
Needless to say, that's why they are not around today. As living things, they failed in a big way.

Was the poetic touch intentional here?

Originally posted by TacDavey
Was the poetic touch intentional here?

No, but apparently, my subconscious is more on top of things than "I" am.

Originally posted by alltoomany
Rulers could not rule if ther was no one to rule over. Animal nature is evil. So why reproduce?

Are you one of those angry feminist?

(I know, angry feminist is redundant)

So we don't all die out?

Originally posted by alltoomany
homosexauls do not have the instinct to reproduce

Um.... yes they do. Haven't you ever heard of surrogate mothers or donating sperm or adoption? With a good friend of the opposite sex "outside" the relationship, it's pretty easy for a lesbian to have a baby, or for a gay couple to have one.

Eugh. Hate comments like this.

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Um.... yes they do. Haven't you ever heard of surrogate mothers or donating sperm or adoption? With a good friend of the opposite sex "outside" the relationship, it's pretty easy for a lesbian to have a baby, or for a gay couple to have one.

Eugh. Hate comments like this.

So you may also believe on the "Making the case for why homosexuality is natural, heterosexuality is not" theroy?

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you one of those angry feminist?

(I know, angry feminist is redundant)

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Better go back in time and prevent yourself from posting this, before Bardock sees it. 313

Phaggy fat-kids don't worry me. I'm prepared.

Originally posted by alltoomany
So you may also believe on the "Making the case for why homosexuality is natural, heterosexuality is not" theroy?

Originally posted by alltoomany
So you may also believe on the "Making the case for why homosexuality is natural, heterosexuality is not" theroy?

Originally posted by alltoomany
So you may also believe on the "Making the case for why homosexuality is natural, heterosexuality is not" theroy?

Both of them are natural. Where the hell'd you get this theory?

Never mind... I know. The same place that you got the notion that homosexuals don't want reproduction.

The place where the person put the bop in the bop shoo-bop shoo-bop and the wham in the whama-lama-lama-lama-lama-lama ding-y bop.

peter got hung upside down for preaching celibacy...eve in marriage

Originally posted by alltoomany
peter got hung upside down for preaching celibacy...even in marriage

Originally posted by alltoomany

...........

Not even going to go there.

Originally posted by alltoomany
Rulers could not rule if ther was no one to rule over. Animal nature is evil. So why reproduce?

BTW, you may be interested in the Cathars; they actually had a similar philosophy to what you are saying.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharism

Originally posted by alltoomany
Yes all this did. We all can have sex without reprodcing. So why do we NEED to reproduce? is the question I ask.

It's the greatest expression of love, to put aside your ego and vanity and to care for something that is completely helpless and would die on its own.

If you have to THINK hmmmm, not so sure about our leaders of government in regards to having a child, don't know too many people that think that way. Maybe a lack of money or raising a child on their own, sure.

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Both of them are natural. Where the hell'd you get this theory?

Never mind... I know. The same place that you got the notion that homosexuals don't want reproduction.

The place where the person put the bop in the bop shoo-bop shoo-bop and the wham in the whama-lama-lama-lama-lama-lama ding-y bop.