Originally posted by Darth Martin
Ledger was a fresh take on the Joker. Was it Hamill? Nicholson? No. Speaking of it not being your version of the Joker; was Nicholson really that satisfying?
Ledger was a good Joker. Nicholson wasn't ideal, no, however, he was more similar to my vision of what the Joker should be. TAS Joker is much more similar to my ideal Joker than both, particularly the MotP Joker.
To me, the Burton films were OK. Nothing horrible, nothing special. Nolan's first film was rather great and stands to this day as one of the best comic book movies ever made. For me, The Dark Knight is tied with Watchmen for the best comic book/superhero movie of all time.
I hate the whole Watchmen story. Heck, I hate almost everything Alan Moore has ever done. It all screams of the occult to me. Anyway, TDK is a great film, but it's been overrated and it doesn't suit my taste in Batman. I like a more noir-ish Batman that takes heavily from the original "Bat-Man" and from the O'Neal/Englehart stories of the '70s. I also like a little bit of Year One thrown in, though Frank Miller is a very overrated writer.
As for your viewpoints, I think your critiquing the film. Let's not forget all the things the film did right. The only viewpoint I agree with you on is Rachel Dawes. Granted, her character is weak in both films.
It got the characterization of Two-Face right. I loved Eckhart as Two-Face. It had an entertaining plot. It had Jim Gordon. It had Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox. It had an entertaining, if flawed for my taste, Joker.
Everything else seemed off to me. Alfred was ok, but not serious enough. Batman has the most annoying voice in the world. Two-Face's origin was completely off. Rachel Dawes got more screentime than she deserved.
The Batsuit was fine for me. Much better than the Begins suit or any other of the live-actions suits for that matter.
It looked way too segmented for my taste. It looked too futuristic. I love the Keaton suits because they weren't all as segmented as TDK suit was, plus they had the yellow oval symbol, which is my personal favorite. I liked that TDK suit let the actor turn his head, but other than that, I just prefer the Keaton suits.
Harvey Dent/Two-Face was fine with me. Arguably the most standout performance in the film. I was just upset with the fact that he died as I think he'd have been great for a sequel.
The characterization of Two-Face was spot on. The origin? It wasn't. I hate the idea of tying a great character like Two-Face to a second-rate fill in like Rachel Dawes. Nolan has creative freedom, and it's still a valid interpretation. It's just not my favorite interpretation.
Your flaws seem to be more personal of what YOU would do with your Batman film. Which is fine. I do the same things. But TDK got more things right than wrong.
That was kinda what I was saying. It's a nice film, but it's not my ideal Batman. That's why I'd much rather just write the stories myself.