Denton Van Zan vs Riggs

Started by quanchi1129 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
Riggs after being tortured was able to beat a trained merc, your feat doesn't even come close to matching that. and the dragon feat isn't a hth combat feat so it's worthless for this thread.
Laughing off one the star of the film's punches who was surviving in a post apocalyptic environment is no small feat. You can pretend it was but it wasn't.

Again, Riggs after being tortured was able to beat a trained merc, your feat doesn't even come close to matching that. and the dragon feat isn't a hth combat feat so it's worthless for this thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, Riggs after being tortured was able to beat a trained merc, your feat doesn't even come close to matching that. and the dragon feat isn't a hth combat feat so it's worthless for this thread.
Riggs had recovered. The guy he beat wasn't impressive nor did he have a big role in the film. Zan treated the star like he wasn't even there.

Riggs being fully recovered is nothing but your speculation, you have zero proof to back that up.

And no, the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Riggs being fully recovered is nothing but your speculation, you have zero proof to back that up.

And no, the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

Do you think he was out of energy for their fight ? Did it seem that way to you ?

Yes, it was since quinn was of no consequence. Riggs didn't shrug off his opponent like he didn't exist.

None of what you just posted changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
None of what you just posted changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

I am going by what I saw. You acting like he was still physically taxed isn't what happened.
The ease in which Quinn was handled was more impressive than Riggs fight against the merc.

You still haven't posted anything that changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You still haven't posted anything that changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

The eye test. Most things can't be proven or disproven definitively. You hneed to think for yourself.

Yes, it is.

Still waiting for you to back up your claims.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Still waiting for you to back up your claims.
I did you just ignore or downplay. Same thing you have always done. I told you I won't supply anymore.

No, you posted one inferior feat and one feat that had zero relevance to a HTH thread.

Try posting something that actually backs up your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you posted one inferior feat and one feat that had zero relevance to a HTH thread.

Try posting something that actually backs up your claim.

No, I didn't. I supplied two feats in which you either downplayed or ignored.

I won't post anymore.

No, you posted one inferior feat and one feat that had zero relevance to a HTH thread.

Try posting something that actually backs up your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you posted one inferior feat and one feat that had zero relevance to a HTH thread.

Try posting something that actually backs up your claim.

I gave one superior hand to hand feat and then one awesome feat in general. You ignored both; essentially. You can pretend they weren't great feats all you want. I already out feated you.

What you posted was one inferior feat and one feat that had zero relevance to a HTH thread.

Try posting something that actually backs up your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
What you posted was one inferior feat and one feat that had zero relevance to a HTH thread.

Try posting something that actually backs up your claim.

I did. You claimed it was inferior. You will do the same with any other feats. No point.

Do you have anyone that can verify that you posted superior feats, or is this another example where you're claiming that your opinion is a fact?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Do you have anyone that can verify that you posted superior feats, or is this another example where you're claiming that your opinion is a fact?
Like I said you downplay. I provided two. I am not providing anymore.

Do you have anyone that can verify that you posted superior feats, or is this another example where you're claiming that your opinion is a fact?