mmm
We've only ever seen two ways of permanently defeating a Black Lantern:
1. Multiple emotional spectrum energies
2. Mogo's core, where they'd be constantly incinerated as they reformed and where his gravity would keep them from escaping.
Obviously the first option is out for the Superman Dynasty. They second they could actually replicate, using heat and force vision, but it's not like they could literally do that forever.
The real problem with the Black Lanterns is that they number in the billions. We don't know the Superman Dynasty's numbers, but I'd guess it's less than that.
The more I think about it, as I write this, the more options I could actually think of for the Superman Dynasty to win. Titano and Kal Kent held a galaxy with their collective force powers, so I suppose if all of the Black Lanterns were in front of them they could contain them pretty easily. Then it would just be a matter of tossing them into a star, which I would think would do an admirable job of replicating Mogo's feat.
Then the problem becomes Nekron and dealing with him...I'm not sure how they do that.
This is all assuming that the 5D Imp Superman isn't involved. If he is, then this gets a lot easier.
Originally posted by Galan007
That analogy isn't really true at all.
It kind of is.
A 5D Imp is likely more powerful than the rest of the Superman Dynasty combined. Likewise, Nekron is equal to or greater than the rest of the Black Lanterns.
In that sense, neither of their posses are relevant, just as it would be when involving omnipotents.
Originally posted by CogitoIncorrect.
It kind of is.A 5D Imp is likely more powerful than the rest of the Superman Dynasty combined. Likewise, Nekron is equal to or greater than the rest of the Black Lanterns.
In that sense, neither of their posses are relevant, just as it would be when involving omnipotents.
In a thread that involves "the entire Superman Dynasty" it should obviously be assumed the Superman of the 5th dimension is on that roster, because he is a full-fledged member of the SD.
On the other hand, if you specify "all Marvel heroes" then it would certainly not be assumed that TOAA is on that list, as he is not quantified as a Marvel hero. Hence why his analogy did not apply.
Originally posted by Galan007
Incorrect.In a thread that involves "the entire Superman Dynasty" it should obviously be assumed the Superman of the 5th dimension is on that roster, because he is a full-fledged member of the SD.
On the other hand, if you specify "all Marvel heroes" then it would certainly not be assumed that TOAA is on that list, as he is not quantified as a Marvel hero. Hence why his analogy did not apply.
Well, yes the analogy is broken because of the word "heroes". I think you get what he meant, though.
Pretty much. If thread is one group against another we don't automatically remove the power members of said group or team. If its the entire group its the entire group, it just means that they have a high end power on it.
If the op takes them out ok, but if they are legitimately on a team then they count as part of it.
Originally posted by Galan007Truth Pro Quo
Incorrect.In a thread that involves "the entire Superman Dynasty" it should obviously be assumed the Superman of the 5th dimension is on that roster, because he is a full-fledged member of the SD.
On the other hand, if you specify "all Marvel heroes" then it would certainly not be assumed that TOAA is on that list, as he is not quantified as a Marvel hero. Hence why his analogy did not apply.