Originally posted by Starscream M
the problem is1) its old as phuck (why not use more recent examples if they exist)
2) its out of line with modern thor's strength (who would not be able to lift a mountain, let alone a serpent the size of earth)
1) They do, but that's the classic showing. It being old, doesn't disqualify it.
2) You're an idiot.
Originally posted by Starscream M
do you think thor is vastly stronger than sentry? depiction of strength has changed from the days when heralds could move planets
I assume you're also against using Gladiator busting a planet or swimming through a star. If so, I'm not sure why you think he has the edge over Thor strength wise.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
So the midgardserpent feat is just all made up and fake lol! Carver is so full of shit!1. Thor went fishing for the Midgardserpent not once but twice. First time his companion got freaked out and cut the line. second time he forcefully pulled it from earth. Serpent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any little skyscraper
2. Thor, with brittle bones that are not healing, was able to lift the feet of the Midgard serpent disguised as fin fang foom. again serpent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anly little skyspcraper
3. Thor lifted the kitty cat that was actually the midgard serpent. again Midgard serpent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little buidlings.
and i'll say it again. carver is full of shit. i dont know why rage even bother with you clearly you don't even buy comics and just rely on scans and illegally obtained scans as proven by you asking for scans of nul coming out of the smashed hammer.
you wana tell me over so many freakin years of carrer all thor's lifting feats are fishing a giant snake? 😆
2 and 3 are irrelevant since he took there form so thor didnt have to lift the actual weight of the misgard serpent but the forms he took and its laughable to state thor lifting fing fang fom feet as a real lifting feat its something the thing could do
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusI am against planet busting feats as a general matter
What a horribly contrived argument.I assume you're also against using Gladiator busting a planet or swimming through a star. If so, I'm not sure why you think he has the edge over Thor strength wise.
again, you'll bash me for this, but I base gladiator's strength superiority from the X-Men cartoon...when he effortlessly threw juggernaut hundreds of miles. I can never see thor doing that. But obviusly you're gonna dismiss it.
Originally posted by Starscream M
why don't you start by posting a thor strength feat within the past 10 years you clown!
If you're willing to abide to your own rules (As stupid as they are), I'm willing to debate Gladiator/Thor using only feats in the last 10 years.
Of course I'm sure you'll make some shit up soon that favors your side like you do with everything else.
Originally posted by Starscream M
I am against planet busting feats as a general matteragain, you'll bash me for this, but I base gladiator's strength superiority from the X-Men cartoon...when he effortlessly threw juggernaut hundreds of miles. I can never see thor doing that. But obviusly you're gonna dismiss it.
of course everyone will dismiss it because its a f^ckin cartoon are you serious?
Originally posted by Starscream Mthat's retarded
I am against planet busting feats as a general matteragain, you'll bash me for this, but I base gladiator's strength superiority from the X-Men cartoon...when he effortlessly threw juggernaut hundreds of miles. I can never see thor doing that. But obviusly you're gonna dismiss it.
Originally posted by Starscream M
I am against planet busting feats as a general matteragain, you'll bash me for this, but I base gladiator's strength superiority from the X-Men cartoon...when he effortlessly threw juggernaut hundreds of miles. I can never see thor doing that. But obviusly you're gonna dismiss it.
😬
Why are you not on my ignore list? The fact that I keep replying to someone with obviously a debilitating mental condition really makes me question myself.
Look, Thor one shotted Juggernaut:
http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa469/R-O-O/Thor/ThorJuggernaut1.jpg
http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa469/R-O-O/Thor/ThorJuggernaut2.jpg
http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/aa469/R-O-O/Thor/ThorJuggernaut3.jpg
Thor >>>> Gladiator. But you already know this and seem to forget every conversation we've had, therefore failing to learn anything. Trolling at it's finest.
Originally posted by Starscream M
so what...the characterizations are still accurate.
the cartoon is only based on the comics but it doesnt mean the power levels themselves are equel to the comics, in the cartoon gambit always got his ass kicked and just threw cards, if i was to go by the cartoon i would have never guess he can actually fight
Originally posted by Starscream M
I am against planet busting feats as a general matteragain, you'll bash me for this, but I base gladiator's strength superiority from the X-Men cartoon...when he effortlessly threw juggernaut hundreds of miles. I can never see thor doing that. But obviusly you're gonna dismiss it.
Originally posted by requimthe power levels are never exactly equal...a character can be depicted differently in different storylines, under different writers, even in comics...so its not like comics has one consistent depiction of a character.
the cartoon is only based on the comics but it doesnt mean the power levels themselves are equel to the comics
No problem, would you please just address these inquiries as to avoid problems later on and I'll get to countering all of the feats you've posted thus far:
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Is this limited to purely lifting feats or overall strength? Is Mjolnir allowed or not? Are battle based feats allowed? Durability included in this or not?
