Originally posted by NephthysThe difference is that Alan Moore is a genius and having them twisted like that actually served a narrative and thematic function.
Yes, it sounds like LotR. Which is entirely the point. With the success of LotR comes people trying to jump on the bandwagon. Theres been a steady shift towards Fantasy lately with Harry Potter, the Pirates movies and LotR being financial and critical successes. Alice in Wonderland was the same thing. Alice in Wonderland has brand recognition and its fantasy so it'll draw the crowds, but the story itself is nonsensical and undramatic. So Hollywood makes it simpler and has Alice swordfighting dragons and shit. Same thing here: Brand recognition, fantasy story but too bland in its original form, so they Hollywood it up, add swordfight and you have a marketable movie. Its all designed to appeal to the largest number of people, right down to the casting decisions.
Also its utterly stupid.
I'm not debating whether this film will be fantastic or not.
I'm simply giving it merit for adapting an age old children's story & making it appeal to a much older generation interested in sword & sorcery.
Walt Disney didn't write Snow White, the Grimm Brothers adapted the story from an old German fairy tale.
Fairy tales were meant to frighten children with their underlining morals...they didn't have happy endings or characters breaking into song & dance...like Walt Disney's version marketed to the children.
As far as Burton's Alice sword-fighting a dragon....could the idea have come from Lewis Carroll's sequel, "Through The Looking-Glass"?
Alice returns to UnderLand as a young woman & is told that she is the only one WHO CAN SLAY the Jabberwocky....
And by the way, Lewis Carroll wrote Alice In Wonderland & once again, it's a darker tale than Walt Disney's candied down version.
So SnowWhite & The Huntsman still looks good in my opinion.
I'll settle for a female heroine any day instead of another damsel in distress.
Walt always liked his women helpless & battered.