Doctor Who.
'Yates made clear that his movie adaptation would not follow on from the current TV series, but would take a completely fresh approach to the material. '
So, thoughts? Will this be a cash-in or a legitimately good movie?
Doctor Who.
'Yates made clear that his movie adaptation would not follow on from the current TV series, but would take a completely fresh approach to the material. '
So, thoughts? Will this be a cash-in or a legitimately good movie?
I think the crux of this idea is if the movie is going to be canon or not. If it is, as Yates seems to suggest, going to be a re-boot or full reworking, its going to be crap. I'll call that right now. I'll be a Star-Trek like film that completely misses the point and the charm of the series.
If he is forced to work within the established canon, we might have a better chance of getting a passible or even good movie out of it.
I think the idea of having a Doctor Who movie is not fundamentally a bad one, I mean the current 2 parters are essentially movies already (lengthwise I mean, its not like Doctor Who would have a problem adapting to the long-form movie), and it would require one neat, tidy story, which might be good or useful.
So I think it goes back to the idea of the approach, and that doesn't bode well from the Variety interview. However, they haven't even started writing it or anything, so any huge number of things could happen between now and then.
This could work if they plan on telling the story about the Doctor and how he stole the Tardis. Although, this could also have a negative effect on the running series which would get too tied up around what the movie does storywise were it were part of the continuity. I can see why they are trying to go around it ala Star Trek 2009. I think that course is frought with many negatives. Namely, what Tptmanno1 said about losing the point and charm of the series. Still, I would love to see the Doctor 1 and how he stole the Tardis or The Time War. 🙂