GalanOfTaa
Power incarnate!
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Pretty sure there was more to it than the dropping of mental blocks but this is all irrelevant. I'm still trying to make sense of your original post and how anything you've said so far supports it.
It said specifically on the book that he TAMPERED with his hunger. If he had enough power to destroy all realities, he wouldn't have used Galactus, he would have waited until he reached full power and then he would assume control, now wouldn't he? Oh wait, he did, but still chose to use Galactus... hmmm.
P.S.: The author begs to differ: "Now he would become ravenous as his appetite increased geometrically."
Again, it's not what you think, it's what the writer says that counts. And before you say alternate reality, NO; if anything, it's an alternate 616 timeline, so cosmic hierarchy is present.
rav·en·ous/ˈravənəs/
Adjective: Extremely hungry. (of hunger or need) Very great; voracious.
Basically, a Galactus with no restraint.
Originally posted by leonidas
"feeds only to survive"=/=extremely malnourished. and assuming for one nanosecond you ARE correcct, and g CAN go bca whenever he chooses (which there is no zero to support) he would STILL NEVER DO SO IN A FORUM FIGHT. why? because he fights IN CHARACTER. so....even if you're right you're wrong. he fights to the best of his ability--within character.
Galactus would never cut loose because he claims intrinsic importance to the universal consonance, and that would cause the universe to end sooner.
Although I might have exaggerated a bit by using the world EXTREMELY, it is a fact that he is always malnourished.
Point being is that Galactus is WAYYY above such petty beings, or at least should be, if it weren't for certain writers who view him as a purple man in a cosmic suit.
Originally posted by zopzop
Not to mention the fact that he's NEVER gone BCA against universal and multiversal threats especially since if he could he'dve done it against them.
Why is it that most of you people treat Galactus as an ACTUAL being? Do you even realise that he has been written by many writers, each of them with a different opinion of Galactus?
Now, if we were to talk of him as an actual being that exists (lol), my reply would be: because he claims intrinsic importance to the universal consonance and that would make the universe end sooner. Is this hard to understand?
With this I end my final post in this thread, as not only can you lot not be reasoned with, but because I've got to sleep as well.