Superman vs Thor-The feat war.

Started by JakeTheBank10 pages

I'd say that's durability. At least, the way I use the terms, I wind up using durability to classify how well a character can just outright endure an attack with out visible signs of damage or discomfort.

I can definitely see how others would have their own definitions of the terms, though.

Superman is the end-all/be-all hero in dc...thor isn't in marvel. superman is superior.

he's far smarter
far faster
stronger
more durable
more versatile

Originally posted by Starscream M
...more versatile

Ignoring the rest of your points, do you really think that?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Ignoring the rest of your points, do you really think that?
yes,

he has demonstrated highlevel telepathy (TVO)

he has used his voice to break through space

he has used his speed to do a buncha stuff

etc etc

thor is basically an energy battery and generator

Originally posted by Starscream M
yes,

he has demonstrated highlevel telepathy (TVO)

he has used his voice to break through space

he has used his speed to do a buncha stuff

etc etc

thor is basically an energy battery and generator

😬

You can't be serious.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
😬

You can't be serious.

which part? you have to clarify 😐

Originally posted by Starscream M
which part? you have to clarify 😐

The idea that you think Superman is more versatile than Thor and that Thor is "basically an energy battery and generator".

Originally posted by Starscream M
yes,

he has demonstrated highlevel telepathy (TVO)

he has used his voice to break through space

he has used his speed to do a buncha stuff

etc etc

thor is basically an energy battery and generator

you seem to know less about superman than you do about thor.

Originally posted by -Pr-
you seem to know less about superman than you do about thor.
why do you say that?

Superman has at least done the things he said... That's half the battle. kinda

Originally posted by Starscream M
why do you say that?

By saying thor is less versatile. Superman is versatile for his powerset and his tier, but compared to Thor, no.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Completely unhurt by a point blank energy blast from Surfer:

Damage soak or durability? Both?

imo, a little of both, with Surfer holding back too.

I stand by Thor having more impressive energy projection, versatility, and perhaps even blunt force feats with his hammer. If there's a character Superman can't beat down, I'd bet money that Thor can defeat such a character.

But Superman probably has overall more consistently impressive durability. Supermans the poster child of invincibility for a reason.

Originally posted by -Pr-
By saying thor is less versatile. Superman is versatile for his powerset and his tier, but compared to Thor, no.
no i disagree

thor may have a more versatile powerset on paper, but superman has demonstrated more versatility when the need arises

Originally posted by Starscream M
no i disagree

thor may have a more versatile powerset on paper, but superman has demonstrated more versatility when the need arises

That really doesn't make sense.

Thor used his versatility when the need called for it, otherwise he simply wouldn't have displayed those abilities. When the need called for it, he absorbed the energy of Kang effortlessly and sent it back at him. When the need called for it, he summoned rain capable of halting the Hulk. When the need called for it, he stopped the Null Bomb from destroying a galaxy. Etc, etc, etc. Clark is more creative in battle consistently, but he's not more versatile than Thor.

Originally posted by Starscream M
no i disagree

thor may have a more versatile powerset on paper, but superman has demonstrated more versatility when the need arises

Then you'd honestly be wrong. Also:

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
That really doesn't make sense.

Thor used his versatility when the need called for it, otherwise he simply wouldn't have displayed those abilities. When the need called for it, he absorbed the energy of Kang effortlessly and sent it back at him. When the need called for it, he summoned rain capable of halting the Hulk. When the need called for it, he stopped the Null Bomb from destroying a galaxy. Etc, etc, etc. Clark is more creative in battle consistently, but he's not more versatile than Thor.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Then you'd honestly be wrong.
oh really, has thor ever cracked a space barrier with his voice or demonstrated highlevel telepathy?

Originally posted by Starscream M
oh really, has thor ever cracked a space barrier with his voice or demonstrated highlevel telepathy?

T-VO doesn't exist anymore, and it wasn't technically telepathy to begin with.

Thor has more feats Superman can't replicate than vice versa.

Superman is more versatile than Thor in a fight. Thor is only more versatile if they decided to stand around and talk bullshits.

Actually, scratch that Thor is just a brick with weather powers...Thor's skyfather crutch is more versatile than Superman.

Basically, Thor typically tackles threats with brute force and hammer swings, throws, and the occasional storm summoning. Generally speaking, that's more than enough to stop the average threat he comes across. When dealing with foes or disasters who require more than that, he uses his other abilities when he needs to. People think his pride is like some crippling Achilles heel and Thor outright refuses to call upon his vast power, but comics don't support that. He prefers a straight up physical battle while holding back a vast level of power, true, but when push comes to shove, Thor pulls shit out of his ass as need be. It's not CIS, PIS, or jobbing, or whatever excuse people want to cite it as. It's just reality. Feats support this, but people are intent to ignore or twist them.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Basically, Thor typically tackles threats with brute force and hammer swings, throws, and the occasional storm summoning. Generally speaking, that's more than enough to stop the average threat he comes across. When dealing with foes or disasters who require more than that, he uses his other abilities when he needs to. People think his pride is like some crippling Achilles heel and Thor outright refuses to call upon his vast power, but comics don't support that. He prefers a straight up physical battle while holding back a vast level of power, true, but when push comes to shove, Thor pulls shit out of his ass as need be. It's not CIS, PIS, or jobbing, or whatever excuse people want to cite it as. It's just reality. Feats support this, but people are intent to ignore or twist them.

Like Superman's speed, etc.