Which is more durable?

Started by carver92 pages

Which is more durable?

Which artifact is more durable?

Captain America shield.
Thor hammer
Diana Bracers
Primary Adamantium
Destroyer Armor
Classic Juggernauts
Monarch Armor
Promethium

Rank them from greatest to least.

Re: Which is more durable?

Originally posted by carver9
Which artifact is more durable?

Captain America shield.
Thor hammer
Diana Bracers
Primary Adamantium
Destroyer Armor
Classic Juggernauts
Monarch Armor
Promethium

Rank them from greatest to least.

Diana Bracers
Classic Juggernaut
Monarch Armor
Primary Adamantium
Captain America shield
Thor hammer
Destroyer Armor
Promethium

This thread is going to piss someone off.

Hulks pants

Someone refresh my memory, but wasn't primary adamantium a failed, inferior reproduction of Captain America's shield's alloy?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
This thread is going to piss someone off.

😆

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
This thread is going to piss someone off.

Yep

Originally posted by Mr.Mxyzptlk
Someone refresh my memory, but wasn't primary adamantium a failed, inferior reproduction of Captain America's shield's alloy?

nope, it was not

Re: Re: Which is more durable?

Originally posted by h1a8
Diana Bracers
Classic Juggernaut
Monarch Armor
Primary Adamantium
Captain America shield
Thor hammer
Destroyer Armor
Promethium

Juggernaut has been cut before by Wolverine and Shatterstar, maybe by others. He heals fast but his skin isn't unbreakable.

Thor's hammer has damaged cap's shield a few times.

Monarch's armour was damaged by sbp, sbp was injured by Krypto's teeth ... therefore krypto's teeth should be near the top of the list.

😛

^ It actually was.

Re: Re: Re: Which is more durable?

Originally posted by Scoobless
Juggernaut has been cut before by Wolverine and Shatterstar, maybe by others. He heals fast but his skin isn't unbreakable.

Doesn't Shatterstar's attack have special properties? And when did Wolverine cut him?

And that was his eyes. Never seen his skin cut.

Yeah, i think i was thinking about an eye attack.

Still need to define if we're talking about juggernaut's body or his forcefield though, Thor took down Juggs force field and beat the shit out of him, would have got the ko if not for the old 60 second hammer absence rule.

Re: Which is more durable?

Excluding the DC stuff,

1. Classic Juggernaut (if pure physical damage)
2. Mjolnir = Destroyer
3. Cap's shield
4. Primary adamantium

Rationalization: Adamantium was an unsuccessful attempt to recreate the material of Cap's shield (3 > 4), Mjolnir and Destroyer are both made of enchanted uru and Mjolnir has dented both primary adamantium and Cap's shield (2 > 3), Mjolnir, Cap's shield and Wolvie's claws haven't been able to damage classic Juggs (1 > 2).

Mjolnir and Destroyer are both made of enchanted uru and Mjolnir has dented both primary adamantium and Cap's shield (2 > 3)

Ability to hurt something else =/= something's own toughness.

Hasn't Mjolnir been destroyed and reforged a few times?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ It actually was.

I thought so.

So yeah, Cap's Shield is above Primary Adamantium.

I'd list it as:

Destroyer Armor
Classic Juggernaut
Diana's Bracers
Cap's Shield
Primary Adamantium
Mjolnir
Monarch's Armor
Promethium

Destroyer Armor/Mjolnir/Captain America's shield/Bracers
Adamantium/Monarch's Armor
Juggernaut
Promethium

Caps shield

Haven't mjolnir been destroyed a number of times and Serpent ripped cap's shield apart like tissue paper.
My list would be
Destroyer armor
Diana's bracers
Cap's shield
Primary adamantium
classic juggernaut
Mjolnir
monarch's armor
Promethium

^ What's that supposed to prove? That Thor can't drop superman with a lightning-charged-sucker-mjolnir attack or Cain has a force field that negates momentum of objects?