Re: Which is more durable?
Originally posted by carver9
Which artifact is more durable?Captain America shield.
Thor hammer
Diana Bracers
Primary Adamantium
Destroyer Armor
Classic Juggernauts
Monarch Armor
PromethiumRank them from greatest to least.
Diana Bracers
Classic Juggernaut
Monarch Armor
Primary Adamantium
Captain America shield
Thor hammer
Destroyer Armor
Promethium
Re: Re: Which is more durable?
Originally posted by h1a8
Diana Bracers
Classic Juggernaut
Monarch Armor
Primary Adamantium
Captain America shield
Thor hammer
Destroyer Armor
Promethium
Juggernaut has been cut before by Wolverine and Shatterstar, maybe by others. He heals fast but his skin isn't unbreakable.
Thor's hammer has damaged cap's shield a few times.
Monarch's armour was damaged by sbp, sbp was injured by Krypto's teeth ... therefore krypto's teeth should be near the top of the list.
😛
Re: Re: Re: Which is more durable?
Originally posted by Scoobless
Juggernaut has been cut before by Wolverine and Shatterstar, maybe by others. He heals fast but his skin isn't unbreakable.
Doesn't Shatterstar's attack have special properties? And when did Wolverine cut him?
And that was his eyes. Never seen his skin cut.
Re: Which is more durable?
Excluding the DC stuff,
1. Classic Juggernaut (if pure physical damage)
2. Mjolnir = Destroyer
3. Cap's shield
4. Primary adamantium
Rationalization: Adamantium was an unsuccessful attempt to recreate the material of Cap's shield (3 > 4), Mjolnir and Destroyer are both made of enchanted uru and Mjolnir has dented both primary adamantium and Cap's shield (2 > 3), Mjolnir, Cap's shield and Wolvie's claws haven't been able to damage classic Juggs (1 > 2).