Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
A focused blast against Classic Beyonder that was powerful enough to destroy a billion dimensions...for starters.Was able to hold his own temporarily against Classic Beyonder...who was described (on panel) as being a million times more powerful than everything in our universe combined (except Classic Owen of course).
The OP wanted feats...well Owens feat are superior...its undisputable.
Well, did Owen just display super good offensive power and defensive power?
I ask only because if Owen really only manipulated molecules to an extreme end in terms of energy blasts and shields and what not and still displayed that he needed to think in order to achieve those facts, it may not be as clear cut as it initially seems. Did he display any kind of metal defenses or omniscience or anything like that? Or the means to shield his soul? Or time manipulation?
Basically, I feel that Owen is more powerful than Thanos, but Thanos with the IG has options available to him that Owen does not. I could be wrong, in which case, I'll gladly concede the point, but matter manipulating =/= reality manipulating. Owen could make a pencil from something, but Thanos with the IG could make a pencil equal E=MC^2 (in theory, of course).
lots of his power was inferred but lots was demonstrated. beyonder considered him the most powerful outside of himself. i always wondered about his defenses vs psi's and his HUMAN sweaknesses as well, but given who he's beaten and the esteem in which he was held by the most powerful beings in existence, i guess wwe were to ASSUME he could defend against these things. shrug
Originally posted by leonidas
lots of his power was inferred but lots was demonstrated. beyonder considered him the most powerful outside of himself. i always wondered about his defenses vs psi's and his HUMAN sweaknesses as well, but given who he's beaten and the esteem in which he was held by the most powerful beings in existence, i guess wwe were to ASSUME he could defend against these things. shrug
That's basically what I'm thinking.
From what I know of Reece, he's incredibly powerful (obviously), but still, baseline human. Unless he's actively manipulating molecules to give him shields or warp the composition of attacks coming his way, he's still got human level durability as far as I know. And he still needs to think in order to achieve his effects, which means, for all his power, he could feasibly be beaten to the punch.
The idea that Thanos with the IG could beat him isn't so far fetched if that's the line of thinking we're approaching.
Originally posted by Nihilist
You have been shwon to be nothing more than lair,troll and coward, youve been owned.
Hey I atleast attempted to have a rational, civil, discussion with you, but your ignorance and impulse control could not be controlled...
If anything, this thread (once again) demostrates your complete inability to have a rational discussion about your ghey lover...
Originally posted by JakeTheBankPrretty much the way i look at it, but such things are lost on narrow minded people like LOM.
That's basically what I'm thinking.From what I know of Reece, he's incredibly powerful (obviously), but still, baseline human. Unless he's actively manipulating molecules to give him shields or warp the composition of attacks coming his way, he's still got human level durability as far as I know. And he still needs to think in order to achieve his effects, which means, for all his power, he could feasibly be beaten to the punch.
The idea that Thanos with the IG could beat him isn't so far fetched if that's the line of thinking we're approaching.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderLOL did, and i asked you to back youre statement up, but as usual you cant back up what you say and resort to your usual trolling.
Hey I atleast attempted to have a rational, civil, discussion with you, but your ignorance and impulse control could not be controlled...If anything, this thread (once again) demostrates your complete inability to have a rational discussion about your ghey lover...
In short if your not trolling back up what you claimed its that simple and easy.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
That's basically what I'm thinking.From what I know of Reece, he's incredibly powerful (obviously), but still, baseline human. Unless he's actively manipulating molecules to give him shields or warp the composition of attacks coming his way, he's still got human level durability as far as I know. And he still needs to think in order to achieve his effects, which means, for all his power, he could feasibly be beaten to the punch.
The idea that Thanos with the IG could beat him isn't so far fetched if that's the line of thinking we're approaching.
Under forum conditions, Thanos loses; ready, set, go fight...Owen utterly annihilates Thanos right out the gate.
And even if he doesnt, Owen demostrated immortality against Doctor Doom; Doom caught him unaware coming from the store and savagely attacked him and that human durability, but Owen simply created another body and came back.
In addition, check out the OP Jake...the OP states FEATS.
And we all know who has the better FEATS dont we?
Originally posted by Nihilist
LOL did, and i asked you to back youre statement up, but as usual you cant back up what you say and resort to your usual trolling.In short if your not trolling back up what you claimed its that simple and easy.
I proved my point back on page 1; the point being that Owen has better feats than Thanos, and thereby wins under the conditions of this thread...
Cased closed; Owen doesnt need a feat of durability to have better feats than Thanos does...
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Under forum conditions, Thanos loses; ready, set, go fight...Owen utterly annihilates Thanos right out the gate.And even if he doesnt, Owen demostarted immortality against Doctor Doom; Doctor caught him unaware coming from the store and savagely attacked him and that human durability, but Owen simply created another body and came back.
In addition, check out the OP Jake...the OP states [b]FEATS
.And we all know who has the better FEATS dont we? [/B]
Fair enough.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderSo you cant prove what you said and where just trolling and a liar.
I proved my point back on page 1; the point being that Owen has better feats than Thanos, and thereby wins under the conditions of this thread...Cased closed; Owen doesnt need a feat of durability to have better feats than Thanos does...
And you wanna go do the line of "the bell rings and Owen fires striaght off" Thanos stopped time on a universal scale instantly" Owen on panel cant do a thing against that.
Originally posted by Nihilist
So you cant prove what you said and where just trolling and a liar.And you wanna go do the line of "the bell rings and Owen fires striaght off" Thanos stopped time on a universal scale instantly" Owen on panel cant do a thing against that.
Classic Owen is greater than the entire 616 universe combined; time stop wouldnt do jack to stop Owen...
Just face the facts; Classic Owen is the 2nd most powerful character ever written by Marvel...Thanos cant beat him.
Originally posted by Nihilist
So you cant prove what you said and where just trolling and a liar.And you wanna go do the line of "the bell rings and Owen fires striaght off" Thanos stopped time on a universal scale instantly" Owen on panel cant do a thing against that.
Ok...if I'm a liar, point out anything I said on page 1 that isnt true.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderShow me on panel Owen being able to effect time on the scale Thanos did seeing as Thanos not damaging other universes with a blast is b all and end all of things.
Classic Owen is greater than the entire 616 universe combined; time stop wouldnt do jack to stop Owen...Just face the facts; Classic Owen is the 2nd most powerful character ever written by Marvel...Thanos cant beat him.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderYou said Owen durability wasnt as good because he wasnt at his true potential, which you have constantly FAILED to back up with proof only bs.
Ok...if I'm a liar, point out anything I said on page 1 that isnt true.