Originally posted by JakeTheBank
That being said, it's not like Carver knows what he's talking about in any case, so it doesn't matter. biscuitsAnd it's better than another "Thor (w/o Mjolnir) versus (possibly amped) Wolverine and/or one of his rogues/affiliated character" thread.
I was just trying to make juvenile pun.
Originally posted by JakeTheBankwell, my threads were never onesided. I only removed Mjolnir to make it fair for thor's opponent, not to handicap thor.
Nope. You did make a couple of those threads, though. It just happens to be a type of very common thread that keeps springing up before being closed due to spite and massive flaming/trolling.
Originally posted by Starscream M
well, my threads were never onesided. I only removed Mjolnir to make it fair for thor's opponent, not to handicap thor.
They're still one sided in the fact that even without Mjolnir, Thor can still mess them up with his bare hands....
But that's a discussion for another time. 🙂
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
They're still one sided in the fact that even without Mjolnir, Thor can still mess them up with his bare hands....But that's a discussion for another time. 🙂
I know its the holidays but you still need to drink responsibly and limit the consumption of that spiked eggnog.
Originally posted by Starscream M
it may surprise you, but thor is one of the characters I'm most familiar with. just because I don't buy into his overhype doesn't mean I'm ignorant.
I find that hard to believe as you displayed a consistent lack of knowledge of what he's done in his comics. There's nothing wrong in being ignorant of a character or their capabilities, but there is when you turn around say you're familiar with them. ermm
Originally posted by JakeTheBankreally, tell me exactly one thing I ever got factually wrong about thor...I won't hold my breath
I find that hard to believe as you displayed a consistent lack of knowledge of what he's done in his comics. There's nothing wrong in being ignorant of a character or their capabilities, but there is when you turn around say you're familiar with them. ermm
Originally posted by JakeTheBankno, I never said they were limited by the natural laws of science
Okay.-When you said that Thor's weather powers were limited by the natural laws of science.
That's a pretty glaring and obvious mistake.
I said his lightning is not inherently different from natural lightning though
I also said that just because his weather powers are derived from magical origin does not afford them any property people want to choose
Originally posted by Starscream M
no, I never said they were limited by the natural laws of scienceI said his lightning is not inherently different from natural lightning though
I also said that just because his weather powers are derived from magical origin does not afford them any property people want to choose
Yes, you did.
It depends. He can summon lightning from the atmosphere, manipulate lightning that's already present, or summon lightning far beyond the scope of the natural. So again, you'd be wrong.
People aren't affording them any property they want because of magic.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
That being said, it's not like Carver knows what he's talking about in any case, so it doesn't matter. biscuitsAnd it's better than another "Thor (w/o Mjolnir) versus (possibly amped) Wolverine and/or one of his rogues/affiliated character" thread.
Lol...I don't make bate threads. I made this thread because these 4 are basically debatable. Some people will say Supes...some will say Surfer, some will say Thor and I will say Hulk.
By the way...I would own you Jake.