Originally posted by Mr MasterThat means very little when you look at what happened in their battle.
I may have to disagree with this friend.*edit*
I should throw this one in too,
Odin hit Thanos the 3 times:
since it's also [b]afterImo, in both scans Thanos looks ok, and confident he can win.
btw. I'm not saying Thanos would win either way,
I'm just scrutinizing this particular part of this battle, without the Trident. [/B]
^^^ But that's the result of Thanos being hit by Odin 3 times before the Trident,
so what other part of the battle is missing?
Originally posted by Silent MasterThanos fans feel that their opinions trump what the comics actually show.
I like Thanos but I'm not a particular fan of his.
My favorite characters are actually Reed and Captain Marvel,
and I used like Doc Samson fighting the Hulk when I was teenager. :lol
That aside, my preferred genre is Comics, and has been for many years now.
Anywho, I'm just weighing here on something that imo is valid.
We're like referees here and just like in life they score the fight differently,
I guess we're doing the same.
Originally posted by Silent MasterThis Odin caused Thanos to stagger then later on slapped him away with a backhand compared to Thanos and his bugbite like attacks it's obvious at least to me that the difference in damage is a substantial one. If the fight were to go on a half a dozen of those backhands would have built up on Thanos while the bugbites attacks would have little to no affect on Odin
Yea....You're giving Thanos far to many points for being unable to really effect Odin and not giving Odin enough points for his effect on Thanos.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
no shield was shown nor was it ever metioned at all as being up or being broken.
Looks like a shield to me.
That is simply artistic depiction of a blast hiting Thanos from behind. No shield was ever mentioned being present and NO shield was ever mentioned being broken. Considering Thanos clear history of Thanos calling on his shield and it ACTUALLY BEING CLEARLY SHOWN.. Or sometimes it's NOT shown at all (invisible) but it's mentioned and SAID to being broken or getting close to breaking (Omega, Galactus, Champion just to name 3) None of those things happened here, so no, that wasn't a shield.
Originally posted by vince_slice
I think Thanos has the durability to hang with skyfathers in a prolonged fight, like he did with Odin. But he lacks the offensive power to hurt them before they seriously hurt him. Against Zeus his durability will keep him in the fight for a while, but Zeus will KO him before he can do enough damage to Zeus eventually. It's by no means a stomp in Zeus' favour though.
Well his durability is definitely up there. He's known for that, and I agree that it won't be a stomp in the beginning, but in the end it will get really nasty. I agree though, I don't see him actually damaging a skyfather like Odin or Zeus. It would certainly be interesting to see.
Originally posted by Silent MasterOf course because your interpretation of a comic fight is the authority right? Get over yourself and learn to accept the fact that people have different opinions. Just because their opinions differ from yours doesn't mean you can insult their integrity.
No, you get labeled a fanboy when you try and claim that Thanos held his own or that the fight was a stalemate...seeing as neither is true.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
That is simply artistic depiction of a blast hiting Thanos from behind. No shield was ever mentioned being present and NO shield was ever mentioned being broken. Considering Thanos clear history of Thanos calling on his shield and it ACTUALLY BEING CLEARLY SHOWN.. Or sometimes it's NOT shown at all (invisible) but it's mentioned and SAID to being broken or getting close to breaking (Omega, Galactus, Champion just to name 3) None of those things happened here, so no, that wasn't a shield.
Still looks like a shield.
Originally posted by vince_slice
Of course because your interpretation of a comic fight is the authority right? Get over yourself and learn to accept the fact that people have different opinions. Just because their opinions differ from yours doesn't mean you can insult their integrity.
Their opinions not matching the comics is what makes them wrong.
Originally posted by vince_slice
You mean my opinion not matching your interpretation of the comic? Of course your opinion is absolute and infallible. If someone has a different opinion they must automatically be fanboys.
No, I mean their opinion not even coming close to matching what the comic cearly shows.
