Based purely on their showings against Thor, Juggernaut is more durable.
Juggs has tanked Thor's godblast without much effect, whereas Galactus ran away hurt. Thor's most powerful Mjolnir toss has been shown to be ineffective against Juggs, whereas Thor w/ Mjolnir has caused considerable damage to Galactus.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Galactus.
Originally posted by Magnon
Based purely on their showings against Thor, Juggernaut is more durable.Juggs has tanked Thor's godblast without much effect, whereas Galactus ran away hurt. Thor's most powerful Mjolnir toss has been shown to be ineffective against Juggs, whereas Thor w/ Mjolnir has caused considerable damage to Galactus.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I think Thor was weakened at the time of the blast against Juggs iirc. Galactus was also weakened at the time due to expending energy against Ego. Galactus is far more durable.
this pretty much sums it up. and also, how do these threads last? this is one of the most ridiculous threads i've ever seen.
Essentially, most ppl here are saying that DESPITE of their showings against Thor, Galactus is more durable. This, however, is not what was asked in the OP.
BASED ON their showings against Thor, Juggernaut IS more durable. I can't see how anyone could come into a different conclusion when only looking at their respective showings vs. Thor.
Galactus.
Originally posted by Magnon
Based purely on their showings against Thor, Juggernaut is more durable.Juggs has tanked Thor's godblast without much effect, whereas Galactus ran away hurt. Thor's most powerful Mjolnir toss has been shown to be ineffective against Juggs, whereas Thor w/ Mjolnir has caused considerable damage to Galactus.
Cain withstood the God Blast, but that was with his force field and it was weaker than the one used against Galactus.
The force field was also what stopped Thor's hammer throw. It should also be noted that Thor was noticeably weaker than he would be at full strength in his first battle against Juggernaut. It wasn't his most powerful throw either.
On the flip side, he beat Juggernaut around with only his fists which is something I have a hard time seeing happen against Galactus unless his like starving or something.
Originally posted by Starscream M
it was not weaker. you're making that up.also, classic juggernaut is far more durable than galactus.
Not really. All one has to do is observe the two scenes to reach the conclusion I have.
How can you still say that after the scans I've posted? At this point, you either have short term memory loss or are blatantly ignoring evidence. Either way, you shouldn't be allowed to enter discussions.
It's true, Galactus has some low showings, but they're nothing compare to Cain's.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympusyour answer just proves that you made that shit up. nowhere does it ever say one godblast was weaker or stronger. stop propogating that lie.
Not really. All one has to do is observe the two scenes to reach the conclusion I have.How can you still say that after the scans I've posted? At this point, you either have short term memory loss or are blatantly ignoring evidence. Either way, you shouldn't be allowed to enter discussions.
It's true, Galactus has some low showings, but they're nothing compare to Cain's.
your scans were PIS, and I suspect their canonicity.
Galactus has never shown great durability (everytime he's been attacked, he's been injured, whether its thanos, brb, thor, etc)
Originally posted by Starscream M
your answer just proves that you made that shit up. nowhere does it ever say one godblast was weaker or stronger. stop propogating that lie.
Uhuh. Starscream, I know I'm not going to change your mind so I'll just post the scans for people to decide themselves.
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/WeakThorvsJuggernaut14.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/WeakThorvsJuggernaut15.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThorvsGalactus7.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/ThorvsGalactus8.jpg
Thor used the God Blast against Juggernaut, Galactus and Exitar, it was a different level of power each time. The strongest being the one against the Celestial as Mjolnir shattered even when fortified.
It should be noted, Thor was noticeably weakened at the time he fought Juggernaut.
Originally posted by Starscream M
your scans were PIS, and I suspect their canonicity.
Lol, you're so full of it.
Originally posted by Starscream M
Galactus has never shown great durability (everytime he's been attacked, he's been injured, whether its thanos, brb, thor, etc)
Nice try at lowballing. Yes, Thor has injured Galactus (Thanos and Bill didn't actually do anything) but his done the same to Cain with his bare fists:
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/JuggernautvsThor6.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e139/RageOfTheGod/Thor/JuggernautvsThor7.jpg
And, Galactus isn't the only one with low showings:
http://i47.tinypic.com/2qu3l8x.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/mjvaci.jpg
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/5/54474/1063806-spider_man_016_18_super.jpg
Compare to that, the World Eater is is golden.
Originally posted by Starscream M
thanos hurt galactus, and brb visibly damaged galactus.
Thanos and Bill both inconvenienced Galactus but neither of them actually hurt him.
Originally posted by Starscream M
gimme the line where thor says its weaker. I don't care for your 'interpretations'.
At no point did Thor clearly state that the one used against Juggernaut was weaker if that's what your looking for. Unfortunately, that doesn't in anyway disprove my conclusion.
The fact that he mentioned the scene with Exitar is clear evidence that the statement was not a direct comparison of power. The God Blast used against the Celestial was far and away more powerful than the one used against Juggernaut.
I could try asking DeFalco if you want. Though that definitely won't help your case.
