Originally posted by Placidity
You see using the line "just that powerful" is a way of avoiding the issue altogether. It is obvious how SS can beat Shadowcat or destroy a planet. However, what Hulk fanboys are attempting to do is to pretend that it would be equally as obvious how Hulk would beat Shadowcat or destroy a planet - "he is simply that powerful", and act as if that in itself is sufficient explanation.
that whole statement only works with the underlying assumption that Hulk can't do the things he is consistently shown doing with his "physical power".
With Surfer you are assuming some sort of matter manip to over come Shadowcat's phasing are you not? you are assuming that he will have sufficient 'power' to overcome her attempts at such attacks whilst his blasting and matter manipulation powers are far too much for her defences (this all presumes you are not simply suggesting Surfer speedblitz attacks her, something else he is well capable of).
Hulk has a history of high-end matter manipulation resistance, he has a history of blowing apart opponents with ThunderClaps, which have done everything from knocking out high heralds to demolision the Dark Dimension (this, as Savage Hulk, not the more recent examples talked about here)... That would be an obvious demonstration of how he is indeed "that powerful".
On top of all that, we have on panel evidence of Hulk casually shrugging off her attempts to phase him into the ground, it has no physical effect on him, he merely 'breaks free' (he has been shown to be as physically strong and resistant on the molecular level as on the macro level).
Further he does have the power to destroy worlds with ease, as we have seen him do when he cuts loose a little. And on top of that, he is demonstrated as being "functionally immortal" by restoring himself in a weaker incarnation, from mere gamma radiation.
So yes, for the example you put forward, an argument that "Hulk is just that powerful" is as perfectly valid for Hulk as it is for Surfer.
Now if it were Hulk versus UniLord or something, then there would be a case to debate the extent of his powers of recovery and the efficacy of his destructive powers but that's not what you're quibbling about so ...