Originally posted by leonidasThe flame and sword are made for each other. Odin, all asgardians, the fates, beta ray bill, Zeus and his people plus half of earths heros believed Surtur. We have seen twilights power even cut back in time. What has the sword of superman ever done besides float around space?
meh, twilight needs an outside source in order to perform it's ultimate job. and i really have a hard time believing surtur--even with the sword lit--could ACTUALLY destroy the whole universe....sword of superman is a great choice.
Originally posted by country1000
The flame and sword are made for each other. Odin, all asgardians, the fates, beta ray bill, Zeus and his people plus half of earths heros believed Surtur. We have seen twilights power even cut back in time. What has the sword of superman ever done besides float around space?
IIRC, Superman was merging with the universe/infinite itself. It was a sword created by God at the birth of the universe for someone worthy to become God, basically. Superman rejected it, of course.
Originally posted by Cogito
IIRC, Superman was merging with the universe/infinite itself. It was a sword created by God at the birth of the universe for someone worthy to become God, basically. Superman rejected it, of course.
so no feats. I thought Excaliber + amulet was a multiversal weapon. (or is that crazy inaccurate?)
Anyway he-mans sword out of the list but I don't know much about the others.
Originally posted by country1000
The flame and sword are made for each other. Odin, all asgardians, the fates, beta ray bill, Zeus and his people plus half of earths heros believed Surtur. We have seen twilights power even cut back in time. What has the sword of superman ever done besides float around space?
mjolnir has cut back in time (until the pis power was removed). ss can go back in time. so? when kal DID touch it he began merging with the universe. he realized that he rejected that much power. the sword had religious undertones and was supposed to have made him, in essence, god. it had one appearance and has never been used, so looking for feats is pointless. the implications were clear as day imo though.
and......twilight STILL requires an outside source to be fully powered. it says sword, not sword+outside source. if you choose to believe that surtur--with a lit sword--could actually destroy the universe (literally kill all the cosmics and eternity), well....... okey-dokey. i'll not be buying that however. in any way shape or form.
Originally posted by Lord Feron
so no feats. I thought Excaliber + amulet was a multiversal weapon. (or is that crazy inaccurate?)Anyway he-mans sword out of the list but I don't know much about the others.
yeah, no feats. but, like i said, implications were pretty clear. so, meh. excalibur would be my next choice. sword+amulet=OMNIversal, not multiversal.
from the list he-man's should win. join it with skeletor's and it would be a lot better. and since we're joining flame and sword, might as well join the 2 swords and the sword and the amulet.....
Originally posted by leonidasMjolnir nor ss can contain Odin in the heart of asgard. Surtur WILL destroy the universe if not challenged and stopped is some manner. Just like thor was destined to die fighting the midgard serpent ( unless strange events hinder the pre-destined event ) Surturs role in destroying all that is, is well known, thats why Odin,thor and loki did ALL they could to prevent surtur from lighting his sword.
mjolnir has cut back in time (until the pis power was removed). ss can go back in time. so? when kal DID touch it he began merging with the universe. he realized that he rejected that much power. the sword had religious undertones and was supposed to have made him, in essence, god. it had one appearance and has never been used, so looking for feats is pointless. the implications were clear as day imo though.and......twilight STILL requires an outside source to be fully powered. it says sword, not sword+outside source. if you choose to believe that surtur--with a lit sword--could actually destroy the universe (literally kill all the cosmics and eternity), well....... okey-dokey. i'll not be buying that however. in any way shape or form.
Originally posted by country1000
Mjolnir nor ss can contain Odin in the heart of asgard. Surtur WILL destroy the universe if not challenged and stopped is some manner. Just like thor was destined to die fighting the midgard serpent ( unless strange events hinder the pre-destined event ) Surturs role in destroying all that is, is well known, thats why Odin,thor and loki did ALL they could to prevent surtur from lighting his sword.
well, of course they can't. neither is a near skyfather level character either..... and he would be stopped imo, even if the sword were lit. none of that changes the fact that you're talking about what the sword MIGHT be capable if it were ever lit. but we're talking about just the sword. not the sword+flame.
Re: The greatest sword of all?
Originally posted by Offendor
He-Man use The Power Sword.
She-Ra use The Sword of Protection.
Lion-O use The Sword of Omens.These swords are some insanly powerfull weapons! We have seen some outstanding and silly powerfull things being done with these swords and I cannot think of any other sword that can candidate as the greatest sword of all time.
What sword do you think should count as the very best sword and why?
He-Man Sword (Gives you also the power of He-Man) > She-Ra (Girl) > Lion-O's Sword
Most powerful? Sword of Superman (aka Sword of God 😐 )
Re: Re: The greatest sword of all?
Originally posted by Batman-PrimeYou have swords that can destroy universes, swords that can cut through anything, swords that can call up demons, swords that can transmute beings and you pick a sword that has zero feats as the most powerful?? Why? Because it has a pretty name or someone's name in it?
He-Man Sword (Gives you also the power of He-Man) > She-Ra (Girl) > Lion-O's SwordMost powerful? Sword of Superman (aka Sword of God 😐 )