Trinity vs. The Big Three

Started by -Pr-6 pages
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
The sad irony that seems to be lost on people is I haven't even chosen to rep Superman.

I'm sorry I assume the worst about you. biscuits

Originally posted by leonidas
tbf, i think odg and i haven't agreed on any one character yet. i wasn\t sure if you (pr) were still in but he said he was open to whomever, as did i. supes bats or ww--i don't mind any of the 3.

I don't think I can commit to it tbh, as I may be starting a new job very soon.

sneer

well, maybe phil is free........? 😖hifty:

SMH at the last page. Lol.

Anyway, if Phil was free to participate, that'd be cool by me.

Originally posted by leonidas
sneer

well, maybe phil is free........? 😖hifty:

don't tease him now; don't pretend to put the toy down and then snatch it back up before he can get his hands on it.

are you kidding--me, odg and phil on one team?? 😂

i doubt the forum would be left standing in the wake of the irony. be fun as hell though.

Which one of you guys are Stalin in this alliance?
________________________
As a tourney whore i want in, but If all the dc side is spoken for, what's left, cap? Prep for him is either non-existent or semi-decent depending on what Jake allows.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
Which one of you guys are Stalin in this alliance?
________________________
As a tourney whore i want in, but If all the dc side is spoken for, what's left, cap? Prep for him is either non-existent or semi-decent depending on what Jake allows.

I think we'd be prepping as a team (so Joel/me, Rage, whoever is Cap).

Originally posted by psycho gundam
Which one of you guys are Stalin in this alliance?
________________________
As a tourney whore i want in, but If all the dc side is spoken for, what's left, cap? Prep for him is either non-existent or semi-decent depending on what Jake allows.
I don't know about leonidas, but I'm prepared to follow whomever's lead. And I'd totally be fine teaming with Philosophia. This is a debate with teams and he knows his sh1t. Whatever insinuations were or were not made, I'd like to think that I'd be trustworthy enough to actually make an effort and not sabotage our own and purposely lose.

I mean, seriously... do I strike any of you as the type to willingly lose an argument? crackers

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I don't know about leonidas, but I'm prepared to follow whomever's lead. And I'd totally be fine teaming with Philosophia. This is a debate with teams and he knows his sh1t. Whatever insinuations were or were not made, I'd like to think that I'd be trustworthy enough to actually make an effort and not sabotage our own and purposely lose.

I mean, seriously... do I strike any of you as the type to willingly lose an argument? crackers

of course i'd team with phil. he and i have butted heads in the past, but, i'd have felt left out if we hadn't. 🙂 and that sh!t stays with me for exactly as long as it takes to log off. i'm f'n horrible at holding rl grudges, let alone e-grudges. 😂

phil does know his sh!t and i think it would be great if he took supes in this thing. though it seems less and less likely anything is going to come of this at all in the near future......

Originally posted by leonidas
are you kidding--me, odg and phil on one team?? 😂

i doubt the forum would be left standing in the wake of the irony. be fun as hell though.

Strong team, though. I'd thoroughly enjoy watching. 👆

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I mean, seriously... do I strike any of you as the type to willingly lose an argument? crackers
I think zopzop knows better than anyone. ermm13

Haven't really been following this thread, but gotta address something:

I'm not a fan of Superman's. I am, however, unbiased, and have given Superman the nod in plenty of matches because, despite my dislike of his characterization and being the "go-to man" for all things DC, I'm well aware of what he's capable of, as well as having a track record of being a fair and knowledgable judge in many tournaments.

Questioning my merit makes you look bad, not me.