Originally posted by lil bitchiness
No. Best religion could mean the ''correct'' religion. Most favourable to live in isn't necessarily the best religion, but it may have the most favourable practices in terms of community.If Satanism is comprised of people who value Satan as a 'rebel' and insists that all should be free to do whatever they want, wear whatever they want, eat whatever they want, but at every full moon sacrifice chickens or some other weird shit in a field, doesn't make their religion the best, but the living conditions most favourable to certain people.
Equally, certain individuals may like eating meat, but being on a Buddhist planet, killing animals for food isn't going to be practised (or killing of anything for that matter) and there may be many other social measures which may be implemented that may not suit certian individuals.
We could possibly assume that there wouldn't be as much oppression as it would on an Islamic planet.That doesn't mean Buddhism the ''best religion'' but it certainly makes it a better living planet than an Islamic one.
Again, this would be up to an individual - certain persons may feel that living in a polygamous society would be more comfortable or what not, and Buddhist planet would be boring.
In short, no, it's not about the ''best religion''.
It may just be a semantic issue, but that sounds awfully similar to how someone selects the "best".
Originally posted by dadudemon
Well...I think it is more like, "Which religion do you think is best as a single-global religion?"
It's at least this.
It's not a bad thing of course. May as well go for the "best" if you're on a planet of exclusively that.