Thors God Blast vs Darkseids Omega Beam

1. Overall which is more destructive and more powerfull?
2. Which is more versatile?

Thor's is far more powerful.

Hey Ozz, I'm assuming that you're talking about the OE, as you mentioned versatility.

As I understand it, a god blast just blows things to hell, and really nothing else, but if anyone would like to show me that it could do other things, I'm interested. Anyway, I'll list some of the things that the OE can do.

1. If by destructive you mean which can do the most damage? Then probably the Omega beams, as they can potentially erase anything from existence if the user wills it (barring beings with extreme cosmic significance). It should also be noted that Superman infused with the energy of Kismet (basically DC's Eternity) and Darkseid's OE were the only things that seemed to be able to breach Imperiex Prime's shell and "defeat" him for lack of a better term.

2. Like I said before, I don't really know that the godblast has so much versatility, as it does raw destructive energy. The OE can erase, resurrect, teleport, time-manipulate, transmute, depower, and maybe some other stuff that I'm missing.

Anyway, if I'm wrong about the godblast, which I may very well be, as I am not a thor expert, and it can do other more "versatile" things, then I am willing to be convinced by anyone who is more knowledgeable about the subject than I.

Omega Effect > Godblast > Omega Beam

Godblast easy

Originally posted by Batman-Prime
Omega Effect > Godblast > Omega Beam

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not if you're being objective about which is more powerful. There's a huge difference in taking out Batman and scaring Galactus off.

And that comment of yours is objective? 🙄

Originally posted by Cogito
And that comment of yours is objective? 🙄

other than their performance against galactus, the beams are far better in so many ways

Without touching 1, how exactly is the Godblast more versatile than the Omega Effect?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
other than their performance against galactus, the beams are far better in so many ways

It's not just the Galactus thing. Four Godblasts held up the multiverse, his Godblast has overcome Cytorrak's enchantment, and blew apart Exitar's skull which was made of even harder material than his outer shell.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not if you're being objective about which is more powerful. There's a huge difference in taking out Batman and scaring Galactus off.

Originally posted by ozz81
1. Overall which is more destructive and more powerfull?
2. Which is more versatile?

1. OE by far
2. OE by far

Originally posted by Cogito
And that comment of yours is objective? 🙄

Originally posted by Starscream M
godblast made juggernaut chuckle 😄

Thor was also weakened at the time iirc.

Godblast is more powerful but the beams are far more useful,practical and useable.

OE>godblast

Omega Beam/Effect.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor's feats speak for themselves. Let's compare. The omega beams were tanked by Doomsday and the omega effect was redirected by Superman's heat vision.

Thor was also weakened at the time iirc.

If you're going to want people to be objective, it might be a good idea not to make biased posts.

Oh come on! Really? OE VS GB? REALLY?!

Even I wont claim that the GB is greater than the OE. Its like saying Thor's GB can take on Odin's most powerful blasts, which is stoooopid.

Omega Effect.