Originally posted by quanchi112Ihave to arge with Quan here. First off yes Zeus was ampped so we have no clue how he really fared.
It wasn't irrelevant and it was still an amp. You have no proof like always. Galactus ftw.
Know We saw Thor was able to produce lighting capable of hurt Chaos king at his peak.
So yes Zeus should be able to bring Galactus to his knees with a huge bolt of lighting bolt. However galactus was about to fed so we know he was not wha i would called his avrage power level well fed.
So we have an amped Zeus. verus a no so well fed galactus.
We so Odin go at Galactus and do ok but it was clear Galactus was going to beat Odin without some amp or help.
SO IF assume Zeus is equal to Odin HE might be able to get a 1 or 2 at best by something like Odin TK or Galactus underestimating him but that is and slime chance that could happned any way
Originally posted by carver9
The writer stated Zeus had a "small" amp. It took one blast to drop Galactus...with the SMALL amp gone, he would just have to one up on his blast and take him out with two.Zeus is a Beast.
No he didn't. Go find the actual quote and you'll realize you're flat out wrong.
If anything, it was Zeus' power that was marginalized since Pak stated that "he's still Zeus" i.e., not ALL of the power is Chaos King's.
Originally posted by carver9
A small irrelevant amp. Zeus 2 shot him. One blast dropped Galactus...imagine what 2 would do.
Utterly inaccurate. Go read the quote.
Pak said you shouldn't take the feat away from Zeus just because the Chaos King had some influence, he said its still Zeus, and we haven't seen him use his full power before, or something to that affect.
Without Chaos King, it might have taken, I dunno, 2 or 3 more thunderbolts instead or something, but Pak sure as hell didn't make it sound like a whole lot.
What does this mean?
Originally posted by CosmicComet
Pak said you shouldn't take the feat away from Zeus just because the Chaos King had some influence, he said its still Zeus, and we haven't seen him use his full power before, or something to that affect.Without Chaos King, it might have taken, I dunno, 2 or 3 more thunderbolts instead or something, but Pak sure as hell didn't make it sound like a whole lot.
No. I will prove myself right and find the quote since yall are way too lazy to back up your own words with the actual evidence.
Pak: I think that is Zeus fighting Galactus, but there is a point where Galactus says — I’m paraphrasing here — “Hey, you’re a little stronger than the average Skyfather.” So I think Zeus is definitely is being augmented by the Chaos King. The Chaos King, as we discover — spoiler alert! — is using Zeus as a Trojan horse. So some of that incredible power that Zeus is displaying comes from the Chaos King. At the same time, Zeus is no pushover, and it’s been a while since we’ve seen Zeus unleash his true, mighty self, and it was a ton of fun giving him a chance to do that. So don’t take it all away from him, friend. I do love my Zeus. I’m going to start saying “Zounds” more often, as a matter of fact. Just in everyday conversation.
"So don't take it all away from Zeus"=/= "most of that was Zeus' power" as people are fallaciously claiming.
And let's not get ahead of ourselves. A Mikabosh-amped Zeus struck down a hungry Galactus with 1 super bolt that it took Big G all of 1 page to recover from. 🤣
I appreciate digging up the quote Power Cosmic, thanks for proving that what I stated/paraphrased from memory was completely correct.
Yep. Only 'some' of it was Chao King's power and Pak said Galactus meant that Zeus was 'a little stronger' than the average skyfather, just as the quote said, and that Zeus was actually using his full might there.
Yep.
Thanks a lot for your help. 🙂
