Top 5 Quantifiable strength fts

Started by abhilegend10 pages

Originally posted by carver9
By the way, I'm just messing with you. Stop finding my old posts.

Nope, its just too much fun. I laughed my ass off at this one
Originally posted by carver9
What are you lol for when its true, trust me, I know more about superman than anyone on this board and I collect ALL of his comics.

I trust you carv.

Originally posted by carver9
Majority of this is unquantifiable fts.

No they aren't. An unquantifiable feat is one such that no approximate Infinum (greatest lower bound estimate) can be calculated.

Unquantifiable feats includes feats of infinity, dimensional feats, etc. Quantifiable feats consists of lifting or moving objects with known minimum weight or mass, punching items with known approximate durability, etc.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
Actually nvr was a great debator and not really bias. He was highly knowledgable of D.C. especially Diana. I argued with him a lot where he actually picked the marvel side many times He's definitely not bias.

The debators who aren't bias are those who doesn't pick a D.C. or Marvel side more than 60-70% of the time. The best debators always seem to pick correctly where you feel it is closer to the truth. IMO, an easy list can be made for those who pick a one company in a non stomp thread (a good fight) more than 90% of the time.

Dude, nvr was/is as biased as it gets. srsly

Originally posted by Galan007
Dude, nvr was/is as biased as it gets. srsly

Just go on herochat and see how much of a horrible debater nvr truly is.

This is the only comic forum I care to tolerate. sneer

Originally posted by abhilegend
Oh and the next time you suspect someone is a sock, contact bada or pr and let them decide it, ok. Now run along.
This all sounds so strangely familiar. mmm

Originally posted by Existere
This all sounds so strangely familiar. mmm

Ok, you tell me existere what should I do when someone accuses me of being a sock?

fess up

Originally posted by abhilegend
Ok, you tell me existere what should I do when someone accuses me of being a sock?
Panic.

Flip a table.

idunrlycare. barker

It's just all flashback to KMC's golden days. I hope you're not Nvr, cause if you are, you've become a lot less hilarious. Still, you don't troll like his previous accounts, and you don't flex your bias in such ridonkulous ways, so, you know, whatevs.

Good catch on calling me 'existere' though. That doesn't sound like a poster that's been here for ages. You're either new, or you're learning.

Originally posted by h1a8
No they aren't. An unquantifiable feat is one such that no approximate Infinum (greatest lower bound estimate) can be calculated.

Unquantifiable feats includes feats of infinity, dimensional feats, etc. Quantifiable feats consists of lifting or moving objects with known minimum weight or mass, punching items with known approximate durability, etc.

Reported for attempting to take this thread back on topic. 🙂.

Originally posted by Existere
Panic.

Flip a table.

idunrlycare. barker

It's just all flashback to KMC's golden days. I hope you're not Nvr, cause if you are, you've become a lot less hilarious. Still, you don't troll like his previous accounts, and you don't flex your bias in such ridonkulous ways, so, you know, whatevs.

Good catch on calling me 'existere' though. That doesn't sound like a poster that's been here for ages. You're either new, or you're learning.

sock

...Requesting a ban for you now....... Smurph. uhuh

Originally posted by Galan007
Dude, nvr was/is as biased as it gets. srsly

Galan look at the poster. It's hia8. The reason he didn't think nvr was biased is because they are both cut from the same cloth. :-/

nvr and abhilegend's post style don't match up at all, aside from how persistent they both are.

i made a comprehensive list detailing nvr's behaviors in a most likely locked thread a while back, and like one out of 12 items match.

he's not nvr, but there's also TGG/makky/embryo and shokosugi biscuits

Originally posted by Galan007
sock

...Requesting a ban for you now....... Smurph. uhuh

schmoll

Fooled most of them, but Galan foils me again.

A like how virtually every strength feat brought up in this tread so far is unquantifiable. 😎

Originally posted by psycho gundam
he's not nvr, but there's also TGG/makky/embryo and shokosugi biscuits
And like a dozen others.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
nvr and abhilegend's post style don't match up at all, aside from how persistent they both are.

i made a comprehensive list detailing nvr's behaviors in a most likely locked thread a while back, and like one out of 12 items match.

he's not nvr, but there's also TGG/makky/embryo and shokosugi biscuits

👆 Yeah stop this stupid accusations. I'm nvr. biscuits

Meh, he's been a member for nearly a year now. If he were nvr, it would have surfaced by now.

Either way, who cares?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
fess up

You first.sneer
Originally posted by Existere
Panic.

Flip a table.

idunrlycare. barker

It's just all flashback to KMC's golden days. I hope you're not Nvr, cause if you are, you've become a lot less hilarious. Still, you don't troll like his previous accounts, and you don't flex your bias in such ridonkulous ways, so, you know, whatevs.

Good catch on calling me 'existere' though. That doesn't sound like a poster that's been here for ages. You're either new, or you're learning.


I think that bieb is just butthurt over our debate in a previous thread. I've read his old posts, he has an astounding capability to anger people. I wish herochat hadn't crashed again, otherwise I'd show you how much nvr has changed.