Originally posted by quanchi112
This is so interesting to see if the posters who always say it adapts somehow argue Lucy wins just because.
I think the winner of this is going to be subjective, as there's no clear comparison or related characters to gauge from.
I wouldn't argue with someone who went with CA Superman, I just personally feel otherwise.
Originally posted by CogitoJust like the winner of the thought robot is subjective in every thread. Lucy somehow overcoming something most argue adapts to any threat is just being biased. I never believed it adapts to anything and attaching a no limits fallacy. It's silly and I am smart.
I think the winner of this is going to be subjective, as there's no clear comparison or related characters to gauge from.I wouldn't argue with someone who went with CA Superman, I just personally feel otherwise.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Eh, if Lucifer is capable of manipulating any force in creation (provided it has been created), I wouldn't be surprised if he bested or other subverted the thought robot.
Exactly. This is infinite reality warping power vs. adapt to anything on the fly.
How do you choose the winner?
Meh. You guess.
Originally posted by Prep-Man
Do you see Mandrakk as superior to Michael?
Morrison basically presented the Monitors as above everything, seeing the multiverse as germs.. They had weapons that dwarfed galaxies, as I recall, and fired reality blitzing missiles and other weird tech.
And the story in general was kind of fourth wall breaking..
It's hard to say where Michael, Lucifer, and Presence stand next to what Morrison set up though...
Originally posted by quanchi112
Just like the winner of the thought robot is subjective in every thread. Lucy somehow overcoming something most argue adapts to any threat is just being biased. I never believed it adapts to anything and attaching a no limits fallacy. It's silly and I am smart.
The Thought Robot didn't adapt to Death if I remember.