Originally posted by Igniz
Wasn't there an issue were Thor was constricted in a weight equivalet to a scores of planets and survived?
Originally posted by carver9
Going by showings, Thor is more durable, going by logic, they are equals. Thor battles are more impressive while Superman space cheese fts are more impressive. The consistent showings of both fighting beings above trans leans more on Thor side, FAR more on his side imo.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman threw a punch which "no force in universe can stop" or something like that. That's what we call hyperboles.
True that feat of Superman is considered hyperbole.But I don't think this feat is.
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/6/69308/1322016-thor_under_score_of_planets_weight_super.jpg
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/6/69308/1322017-thor_under_score_of_planets_weight_2_super.jpg
Here's a bigger picture.
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/7/79564/1823826-thorannual09_29_crop1.jpg
Here's what score means.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_score_mean_in_maths
Why the feat is not hyperbole is because Thor was the one who stated he was being crushed under the weight of 20 planets.Umar is one of the most powerful practitioners of magic.She is second only to her brother the dread Dormammu(who was equal to Odin).
Originally posted by Igniz
True that feat of Superman is considered hyperbole.But I don't think this feat is.http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/6/69308/1322016-thor_under_score_of_planets_weight_super.jpg
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/6/69308/1322017-thor_under_score_of_planets_weight_2_super.jpgHere's a bigger picture.
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/7/79564/1823826-thorannual09_29_crop1.jpg
Here's what score means.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_score_mean_in_maths
Why the feat is not hyperbole is because Thor was the one who stated he was being crushed under the weight of 20 planets.Umar is one of the most powerful practitioners of magic.She is second only to her brother the dread Dormammu(who was equal to Odin).
I think what abhil means when he says "hyperbole" is simply that the feat is symbolic or analogous. It's not actual planets, but a machine or spell or something that's "akin to 20 planets" or a "like neutron star". I too have my reservations about such feats, but I also think that lowballing is a pussbag way to debate, so I just let it be.
Originally posted by Igniz
True that feat of Superman is considered hyperbole.But I don't think this feat is.http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/6/69308/1322016-thor_under_score_of_planets_weight_super.jpg
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/6/69308/1322017-thor_under_score_of_planets_weight_2_super.jpgHere's a bigger picture.
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/7/79564/1823826-thorannual09_29_crop1.jpg
Here's what score means.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_score_mean_in_maths
Why the feat is not hyperbole is because Thor was the one who stated he was being crushed under the weight of 20 planets.Umar is one of the most powerful practitioners of magic.She is second only to her brother the dread Dormammu(who was equal to Odin).
Originally posted by dmills
I think what alhibi means when he says "hyperbole" is simply that the feat is symbolic or analogous. It's not actual planets, but a machine or spell or something that's like 20 planets if a neutron star. I too have my reservations about such feats but I also think that lowballing is a pussbag way to debate, do I just leave it be.
I see what you mean.
Originally posted by dmills
I think what abhil means when he says "hyperbole" is simply that the feat is symbolic or analogous. It's not actual planets, but a machine or spell or something that's "akin to 20 planets" or a "like neutron star". I too have my reservations about such feats, but I also think that lowballing is a pussbag way to debate, so I just let it be.
Originally posted by quanchi112This has -never- happened. Let alone about this topic specifically.
I already dismantled your case
Unless by dismantle, you mean, ignore completely, backtrack, blatantly refuse to accept evidence, or something of that nature, but I'm fairly sure those don't carry similar definitions.
Originally posted by abhilegend
I never thought that exclamation of characters is considered a feat. Surfer recently said that he held a galaxy in his hand, is that a feat too? That is just a hyperbole from the silver age.
TBH I was basing this because of Umar's history.Dormammu himslef bragged being equal to Zeus and Odin.He even has on panel feats that support his own bragging.Dormammu nearly destroyed the Dark Dimension by just being angry.He even turned Thor into Don Blake proving that even he can tamper with Odin's enchantment.And Odin himself has proven to be capable of busting Galaxies.And since Umar is only second to Dormammu, I could put her in the same league as Surtur w/o twilight.So for Umar to produce a spell capable of constricting Thor in a weight of 20 Planets isn't unusual for her since she's the second most powerful in the Dark Dimension.I'd even give Umar the win over any herald level being.
