Originally posted by -Pr-
Stark was only a challenge to Hulk because of the darts, and even they didn't work. Stark being durable isn't going to put him above Thor, and besides, you really think Thor can't wreck a city?Come on, now.
The darts didn't work because they were sabotaged prior to that fight iirc. They were never a factor.
Edit: oops
I dont think people are giving Starks armour enough credit. It actually did pretty well, completely dominating the fight for the first minute or so. Sure it got taken apart in the end but only after Hulk took it up a notch from his "WWH base level". The armour looked a fair bit better than Herc did for instance who only managed to knock Hulk over with his best shot whereas the armour belted Hulk around New York.
Underneath it all is Extremis Stark who might have a decent speed edge and if Tony can rocket a huge adamantium spike into the back of Thors head like he did to Hulk then its all over.
Originally posted by Fifthchild
I dont think people are giving Starks armour enough credit. It actually did pretty well, completely dominating the fight for the first minute or so. Sure it got taken apart in the end but only after Hulk took it up a notch from his "WWH base level".
Key point underlined. Thor wins.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Key point underlined. Thor wins.
I'm not sure what you are saying here. Without getting into a big side discussion about WWH vs Thor, I think Hulk becoming even angrier and stronger than his base WWH levels (when he has the flashback to Caeiras death) would not be something that Thor could casually match in straight melee combat i.e. i dont think thats a point in Thor's favour here. But perhaps you meant something other than how i am reading you.
Originally posted by FifthchildI agree. The only person/people (imo) that did better than Tony against WWH were Sentry and the Gamma Corps (the Gamma Corps pretty much BEAT Hulk.) But Hercules, Ghost Rider, Juggernaut, the X-Men, etc.--none of them did as good as Tony.
I dont think people are giving Starks armour enough credit. It actually did pretty well, completely dominating the fight for the first minute or so. Sure it got taken apart in the end but only after Hulk took it up a notch from his "WWH base level". The armour looked a fair bit better than Herc did for instance who only managed to knock Hulk over with his best shot whereas the armour belted Hulk around New York.Underneath it all is Extremis Stark who might have a decent speed edge and if Tony can rocket a huge adamantium spike into the back of Thors head like he did to Hulk then its all over.
I'm not necessarily saying Tony would beat Thor, but Thor WOULD have to work hard to get the win, imo. Very hard.
Originally posted by Galan007I would say Juggernaut did better than Tony considering WWH couldn't actually straight up beat him like he did Tony he had to resort to BFRing him.
I agree. The only person/people (imo) that did better than Tony against WWH were Sentry and the Gamma Corps (the Gamma Corps pretty much BEAT Hulk.) But Hercules, Ghost Rider, Juggernaut, the X-Men, etc.--none of them did as good as Tony.I'm not necessarily saying Tony would beat Thor, but Thor WOULD have to work hard to get the win, imo. Very hard.