Originally posted by ShakyamunisonOf course he did, why wouldn't he when all of you disgusting charlatans insist on demonising him for loving the girl of his dreams?
He denied it...http://www.charter.net/tv/3/player/vendor/E!%20Entertainment/player/fiveminute/asset/gnrc_14921969
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He denied it...http://www.charter.net/tv/3/player/vendor/E!%20Entertainment/player/fiveminute/asset/gnrc_14921969
This just proves that he's a liar, too!
Originally posted by NemeBro
I don't see anything immoral about two consenting adults ****ing eachother, even if one of the adults is old and wrinkly. They aren't even blood-related.
This.
I do not see a problem if they were blood-related, either...as long as they exercise the results of Row v. Wade if appropriate. 😐
Originally posted by wakkawakkawakka
Well if it weren't for the fact that one of the adults wasn't an adult prior to the relationship starting, then I would kind of agree.It's the ped-factor that's disturbing me the most in this.
Uhhh...
What this guy said:
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
17 is legal is most of the US.
17 is not "ped" anywhere.
One amendment: if you are not sexually developed at 17 (you look like you're 12 or something....which does happen), then being sexually attracted to that 17 year old would be pedophilia. Justifying it not being pedophilia just because of a number does not fly psychologically.
Keep in mind, wakkawakkawakka, that pedophilia is a primary attraction to prepubescent humans. This lady was probably not prepubescent at 17. Considering she was black, most likely, she sexually matured ahead of most American females.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Is there science behind this?
Sure.
Google searched...first result:
"African women have a shorter gestation period, produce more multiple births, have fewer complications giving birth (due to fetus’ smaller head size and elongated skull), and African children become sexually mature at an earlier age and thereafter are considerably more sexually active than other races."
http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap11.html
On top of that, there is even more reasons African American females mature faster, sexually:
Yes, I just used the "black kids do not have dads" argument.
But it is hardly new information to organizations like CPS:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/06/14/us-usa-fathers-idUSN0419185720070614
Originally posted by focus4chumps
lol! oh, dadudemon! 😍care to share any more knowledge on africans, citing stormfront.org?
derp!
Care to cite anything to contradict that? 🙂
Just because it comes from a clearly bias source, does not mean it is wrong (I can cherry pick which information I want to pull out of a white supremacist website). You'll probably rage at the data that shows that humans that sexually mature faster also have higher IQs at that time: something Stormfront would probably not admit to.
Alright, more games.
Originally posted by dadudemon
derp!Just because it comes from a clearly bias source, does not mean it is wrong.
Care to cite anything to contradict that? 🙂
Alright, more games.
must you add to your own embarrassment by once again demonstrating your ignorance of 'burden of proof'?
:edit: remember kids, its easy to win a thread
1-make outlandish claim
2-cite ridiculously bias misinformation site.
3-declair that burden of proof does NOT lie with the one who asserted the claim.
you could be a local celebrity at the conspiracy forum, bro 😉
Originally posted by focus4chumps
must you add to your own embarrassment by once again demonstrating your ignorance of 'burden of proof'?
Again, you have no idea what it means to provide "burden of proof".
If you wish to poke fun and contradict the statement, feel free to do so.
M
Originally posted by focus4chumps
remember kids, its easy to win the thread1-make outlandish claim
2-cite ridiculously bias misinformation site.
3-declair that burden of proof does NOT lie with the one who asserted the claim.you could be a local celebrity at the conspiracy forum, bro 😉
1. It is not an outlandish claim. Covered in just about any health related undergraduate degrees. 🙂
2. Cited more than one.
But here is another since you are literally shitting yourself over the original source:
http://www.med.umich.edu/yourchild/topics/puberty.htm
(Didn't take much google searching to find yet another source. It's fairly common knowledge among medical professionals. I guess this doesn't fit with some weird agenda you have? mwhahaha
3. Already provided 2 different sources of proof before this post. U mad? 🙂
So why did it make your panties in a bunch, again?
Remember, kids, if you want to troll, contradict and then pretend you do not have to back it up.
Originally posted by dadudemon
1. It is not an outlandish claim. Covered in just about any health related undergraduate degrees. 🙂
oh thank heavens. here i was all worried that you were making a complete dunce of yourself. so i guess you can post one of many many valid and easily found references - to support the claim that black children mature earlier than white children - and in turn shut me up proper. i'll be waiting.
:edit: researching your new source.
:edit2:
(of cited article)
source 1 & 2: Error 404 - Not Found
http://www.center4policy.org/children9.html
source 3:
http://www.emcom.ca/Key/marcia.shtml
"However, the authors do suggest some limitations to their data the most significant being that the subjects were selected on the basis of consulting a family physician that resulted in a physical examination. There was no attempt to exclude girls where the visit was percipitated by concerns of early puberty. As there are pathological conditions that result in signs of early puberty that need to be managed clinically, the pressence of these cases in the sample will bias the results towards an earlier age of pubertal development. It is not clear to what extent this factor influenced the results. Nonetheless, this study has caused increased concern about the age at puberty and the possibility that environmental factors can influence pubertal development."
fact is not fact. wanna try again?
Originally posted by focus4chumps
oh thank heavens. here i was all worried that you were making a complete dunce of yourself. so i guess you can post one of many many valid and easily found references - to support the claim that black children mature earlier than white children - and in turn shut me up proper. i'll be waiting.
K.
Did.
Twice, excluding the obviously bias source.
Now rage at me. Follow every single post of mine until you can find a mistake to get back at me for delivering the pwn in two different threads over the last few days. (is that why you are mad?)
Come on: I am waiting for that chest thumping and grunting from you. I know you have been raging and boiling. Surely you won't just let this affront to your massive ego stand? How dare dadudemon show you how ignorant you are twice in such a short period of time.